Is America preparing to abandon NATO and Europe?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68fa/e68fabd473190ef7fc15bcc3c53e8f4216535882" alt="Is America preparing to abandon NATO and Europe?"
At the recently concluded Munich Security Conference, American officials delivered a message that was both familiar and ominous: Europe must do more for its own defense. While this refrain has been heard before, this year’s conference had a different tenor.
The uncertainty surrounding America’s future commitment to NATO has never been higher, as senior officials hinted at growing impatience within Washington. If European allies continue to underinvest in their militaries and rely disproportionately on American security guarantees, they may soon find themselves without them.
French President Charles de Gaulle once remarked, “Treaties are like roses ... They last while they last.” His skepticism about American dominance in European security remains relevant today. Likewise, Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau famously observed, “Living next to you [the U.S.] is in some ways like sleeping with an elephant ... No matter how friendly and even-tempered is the beast, one is affected by every twitch and grunt.”
Both statements capture the lingering concerns among NATO allies, which include the reliability of American leadership; the extent to which Europe can, or must, stand on its own; and the implications for Canada and Europe of a world in which U.S. security guarantees can no longer be taken for granted.
It is difficult to overstate NATO’s historical significance. Born in the early years of the Cold War as a bulwark against Soviet expansionism, it provided the security framework for an American-led transatlantic order. When the Berlin Wall fell, NATO found new purpose in consolidating democracy in Eastern Europe, expanding its membership and engaging in out-of-area operations.
But history moves forward, not in circles, and the strategic environment that once justified NATO’s existence has changed beyond recognition. In 2025, the world is neither bipolar, as it was during the Cold War, nor is it unipolar, as it was in the 1990s. We live in an era of multipolarity, where American hegemony is contested, and the assumptions that underpinned NATO’s longevity are eroding.
The idea that the U.S. might withdraw from NATO has been dismissed for years as alarmism, attributed to President Trump’s personal disdain for the alliance. But reducing this issue to Trump’s temperament is myopic. Even without Trump, the U.S. would be reassessing its role in NATO — not because of one president’s idiosyncrasies, but because the fundamental logic behind America’s leadership in the alliance no longer holds.
Today’s geopolitical realities have little in common with the world NATO was built to manage. America’s foremost strategic challenge is no longer in Europe but in the Indo-Pacific, where China’s rise presents a direct challenge to U.S. power. Meanwhile, Russia, though still a threat to Eastern Europe, is a diminished force compared to its Soviet predecessor. The war in Ukraine has exposed the limits of Russian military capability but also reinforced an uncomfortable truth: The U.S. remains the backbone of European security, while Europe remains reluctant or unable to take full responsibility for its own defense.
The U.S. strategic community is increasingly questioning the costs and benefits of maintaining NATO as it now exists. America spends more on defense than all of its NATO allies combined, yet European powers continue to underinvest in their own militaries. Despite years of American pressure, most NATO members still fail to meet spending target of 2 percent of GDP. If the U.S. disengages from NATO, it will not be because of one administration’s rhetoric but because the alliance no longer serves America’s highest strategic priorities.
How would Europe react to an American withdrawal from NATO? The continent is woefully unprepared for such an eventuality. European nations have long relied on Washington’s security guarantees as a substitute for serious military investment.
While some European leaders have floated ideas about “strategic autonomy,” the reality is that the EU lacks the cohesion, military capability or political will to replace NATO. France and Germany disagree on the future of European defense, while Eastern European states, particularly Poland and the Baltics, still see America, not Brussels, as their primary security guarantor. A U.S. exit from NATO would expose these fractures, forcing Europe to confront its own strategic vulnerabilities.
Moreover, a post-NATO Europe would be a continent of competing security arrangements, not a single cohesive defense bloc. The most likely outcome would be a security framework centered around the most militarily capable states — France, the U.K. and possibly Germany — with smaller nations band-wagoning out of necessity. Meanwhile, Eastern European states would seek bilateral or minilateral security arrangements, potentially deepening their ties with the U.S. outside of NATO’s framework. Such a scenario would fundamentally reshape transatlantic relations, leaving Europe in a precarious position in an era of global instability.
The demise of NATO is not inevitable, but neither is its indefinite survival. The world that gave birth to the alliance no longer exists, and neither does the logic that once sustained it. If the U.S. steps back from NATO, it will not be because of isolationism, but because American grand strategy must prioritize competition with China and a more restrained approach to global commitments.
The real question is whether Europe is prepared for a world in which U.S. security guarantees are no longer unconditional. If NATO’s future depends on America indefinitely underwriting European defense, then NATO, in its current form, has no future at all.
Andrew Latham is a professor of international relations at Macalester College in Saint Paul, Minn., a senior fellow at the Institute for Peace and Diplomacy, and a non-resident fellow at Defense Priorities in Washington, D.C.
-
Europe’s New Reality: Trump May Not Quit NATO, but He’s Already Undercutting It
European officials knew the president’s win would threaten the fundamental precepts of the post-World War II order. But the speed at which it is unraveling has created a crisis of enormous ...The New York Times - 22h -
'America is now an adversary'
Plus, inside the UK's 'right-wing Davos'Financial Times - 2h -
Vladimir Putin prepares for return of western companies to Russia
President orders cabinet to give domestic producers preferential treatment as payback for sanctionsFinancial Times - 3h -
Defending Europe without the US
European capitals are attempting to fill the security gapFinancial Times - 13h -
America has turned on its friends
Donald Trump’s abandonment of allies is real and will endureFinancial Times - 53m -
IRS layoffs underway around the country as millions prepare to file taxes
The IRS has begun laying off more than 6,000 new and newly promoted employees across the country as part of the push to slash the federal government, sources say.ABC News - 20h -
Even “Real Housewives” Star Erin Lichy is Preparing for Trump’s Tariffs
The serial entrepreneur talks the growth of her Mezcal brand Mezcalum and why she’s never bootstrapping a business again.Inc. - 57m -
Elon Musk in row with Danish astronaut over claim Biden abandoned ISS pair
Musk claimed without evidence Nasa’s Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were left stranded on orbital outpost for ‘political reasons’. Elon Musk has become embroiled in a heated row with a Danish ...The Guardian - 4h -
Martin Rowson on Britain desperately clinging to the US while Trump abandons Ukraine – cartoon
Continue reading...The Guardian - 2h -
Ben Jennings on the myth of America’s past – cartoon
Continue reading...The Guardian - 1d
More from The Hill
-
Eric Adams's trial adjourned indefinitely as judge weighs dropping charges
The federal judge overseeing New York City Mayor Eric Adams’s (D) criminal case indefinitely delayed his April trial as he considers a controversial effort by President Trump’s Justice Department ...The Hill - 18m -
Nixon didn’t break the Constitution. Will Trump?
2025 obviously is different from 1973.The Hill - 27m -
Levin defends Zelensky, Ukraine amid sharp words from Trump
Conservative pundit Mark Levin of Fox News on Wednesday sought to defend Ukraine President Volodomyr Zelensky, who has come under days of criticism from President Trump over the Ukraine war. Levin ...The Hill - 35m -
Pepperdine University says Mindy Kaling's new Netflix series 'misappropriated' its basketball team
Pepperdine University has filed a lawsuit against Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery over Mindy Kaling’s upcoming show "Running Point,” alleging trademark infringement regarding its basketball ...The Hill - 47m -
Hamas’s failure to return Israeli mother’s body strains ceasefire
A tenuous ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has been strained by outrage over Hamas’s alleged transfer of an unknown body to Israel in the place of Shiri Bibas, the Israeli mother who was ...The Hill - 50m
More in Politics
-
Eric Adams's trial adjourned indefinitely as judge weighs dropping charges
The federal judge overseeing New York City Mayor Eric Adams’s (D) criminal case indefinitely delayed his April trial as he considers a controversial effort by President Trump’s Justice Department ...The Hill - 18m -
Nixon didn’t break the Constitution. Will Trump?
2025 obviously is different from 1973.The Hill - 27m -
Levin defends Zelensky, Ukraine amid sharp words from Trump
Conservative pundit Mark Levin of Fox News on Wednesday sought to defend Ukraine President Volodomyr Zelensky, who has come under days of criticism from President Trump over the Ukraine war. Levin ...The Hill - 35m -
Pepperdine University says Mindy Kaling's new Netflix series 'misappropriated' its basketball team
Pepperdine University has filed a lawsuit against Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery over Mindy Kaling’s upcoming show "Running Point,” alleging trademark infringement regarding its basketball ...The Hill - 47m -
Hamas’s failure to return Israeli mother’s body strains ceasefire
A tenuous ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has been strained by outrage over Hamas’s alleged transfer of an unknown body to Israel in the place of Shiri Bibas, the Israeli mother who was ...The Hill - 50m