How to legally challenge Trump’s Canada and Mexico tariffs

President Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico, imposed because of fentanyl and illegal immigration, should be legally challenged. Observers worry, however, that courts will be deferential to the sweeping powers granted to the executive under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
This concern overlooks the fact that Trump’s executive order includes an escalation mechanism for Canada and Mexico. It allows Trump to increase his tariffs if Canada or Mexico retaliates.
This tit-for-tat is about waging a trade war, not solving a national emergency. And there’s no way to square it with the letter or spirit of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Crafting a narrower argument about the escalation mechanism, rather than about whether the act allows for tariffs, would be easier, largely yield the same result and raise broader questions about the legislation.
Calls to challenge Trump’s tariffs based on the act are growing by the day. A recent Wall Street Journal editorial tapped widespread sentiment in pitching a case.
But the hesitancy on the part of would-be plaintiffs is obvious. While Trump’s tariffs are unprecedented, and might even be illegal, the legislation is vague, and no court has ruled against a president’s declaration of a national emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Focusing on the escalation mechanism largely sides-steps these pitfalls. Rather than raising questions about the act writ large, the argument would be that one-upping Canada’s and Mexico’s tariff reprisals has nothing to do with fentanyl or illegal immigration. It’s about waging a trade war.
This same logic is currently being argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a case that may go to the Supreme Court. The irony is that this case is about two of four rounds of Section 301 tariffs that Trump slapped on China in his first term.
Back in 2020, U.S. vinyl tile manufacturer HTMX went to the U.S. Court of International Trade to get a tariff refund for most Section 301 tariffs.
It argued that the third and fourth rounds were used to clean up the mess caused by the first and second rounds, which led China to retaliate. Specifically, HTMX explained that the third and fourth rounds gave rise to “an unprecedented, unbounded and unlimited trade war.”
The court didn’t disagree, but said it would “not try to unscramble this egg.” Instead, it asked the United States Trade Representative to do a better job connecting more dots. It said China’s retaliation was “inextricably” linked to the actions that had originally given rise to the Section 301 tariffs and were thus legal. But this was a stretch, hence the appeal.
It’s true that Section 301 tariffs can be modified, including when the policies and practices “that are the subject of such action has increased or decreased.” But fine-tuning these tariffs to deal with changing circumstances is not what happened with China.
The third and fourth rounds of tariffs were about China’s retaliation, not Beijing’s failure to comply with the first rounds. As the Court of International Trade said, “China directly connected its retaliation to the U.S. action and to its own acts, policies, and practices that the U.S. action was designed to eliminate.”
The escalation mechanism in Trump’s executive order is even more untethered to compliance than the latter rounds of the Section 301 tariffs on China. It’s the Achilles heel of these International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs. Courts can condemn them without having to conclude that tariffs can’t ever be used under the act.
Litigation is no substitute for legislation. Congress must do its job to rein in abuses of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes on Imported Goods Act of 2025 is a useful start.
Yet, until Congress acts to claw back its tariff authority, it will fall on the courts to deny the executive a free hand to wage an all-out trade war.
Marc L. Busch is the Karl F. Landegger Professor of International Business Diplomacy at the Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University.
-
Canada's public safety minister addresses border security, tariffs
The Trump administration said that border security is prompting tariffs against Canada and Mexico. President Trump said Canada specifically does not do enough to curb fentanyl from entering the ...CBS News - 4d -
Trump Suspends Mexico and Canada Tariffs on USMCA Goods for a Month
Many imports from Canada and Mexico will be exempt from tariffs, as the president quickly reversed a sweeping trade action taken just two days ago after market turmoil.The New York Times - Mar. 8 -
Trump's Canada, Mexico tariffs try to 'stop the bleeding' in US economy: UAW chief
President Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada and Mexico "are an attempt to stop the bleeding" in the U.S. economy, United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain said.ABC News - Mar. 9 -
Trump makes new Mexico, Canada tariffs threat as UAW leader backs his policy
Shawn Fain, the president of the United Auto Workers union, is backing President Trump's tariffs strategy. This comes as President Trump says tariffs against Canada and Mexico could rise in the ...CBS News - Mar. 10 -
A Timeline of Trump’s Tariff Fight With Canada, Mexico, China and the E.U.
In the first 50 days of his second term, President Trump’s penchant for imposing and then suspending tariffs has shaken markets and confounded trading partners.The New York Times - 5d -
China Hits Canada With Tariffs in Indirect Riposte to Trump
Beijing, which set steep duties on canola, peas and pork, wants Canada and Mexico to resist U.S. pressure to raise tariffs on Chinese goods.The New York Times - Mar. 8 -
'Tariffs break trust': How Trump's trade policy is putting pressure on U.S. farmers
American farmers could ultimately feel even more pain as a result of President Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China.CNBC - 6d -
Sweeping Tariffs Threaten to Undo a 30-Year Trade Alliance
The stiff tariffs President Trump briefly imposed on Mexico and Canada this week could have pushed those allies into recession. The impact for America would be messy.The New York Times - Mar. 7 -
Trump’s Delay on Mexico and Canada Tariffs Came in Response to Market Revolt
With prices still high, the Trump administration is heeding the risks of fanning inflation with import duties.The New York Times - Mar. 8
More from The Hill
-
Democrat on Trump-Putin call: 'Russia remains the obstacle to peace'
Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) said it's clear that Russia "remains the obstacle to peace" following a highly anticipated phone call between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on ...The Hill - 44m -
Trump, Putin agree on limited ceasefire in Ukraine
PRESIDENT TRUMP and Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared to make progress on a limited ceasefire agreement in Ukraine during a lengthy phone call on Tuesday that the White House says is the ...The Hill - 47m -
Kentucky lawmakers pass legislation removing conversion therapy restrictions
Kentucky lawmakers passed a measure Friday seeking to protect the controversial practice known as conversion therapy for LGBTQ youth, repealing an executive order from Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear ...The Hill - 1h -
Democrats ask Trump to remove Patel as acting ATF director
A group of Democrats are calling on President Trump to remove FBI Director Kash Patel as the acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Fourteen Democratic ...The Hill - 1h -
Democrats push back on plans to use military installations as migrant detention centers
Democratic lawmakers are pushing back against Trump administration plans to detain thousands of immigrants living in the country illegally at U.S. military sites. In a letter signed by nine ...The Hill - 1h
More in Politics
-
Democrat on Trump-Putin call: 'Russia remains the obstacle to peace'
Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) said it's clear that Russia "remains the obstacle to peace" following a highly anticipated phone call between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on ...The Hill - 44m -
Trump, Putin agree on limited ceasefire in Ukraine
PRESIDENT TRUMP and Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared to make progress on a limited ceasefire agreement in Ukraine during a lengthy phone call on Tuesday that the White House says is the ...The Hill - 47m -
Kornacki: White men, white women and the gap within the gender gap
NBC News National Political Correspondent Steve Kornacki digs into a NBC News poll that shows divisions along race and gender lines in how the American electorate views DEI initiatives and more.NBC News - 54m -
Kentucky lawmakers pass legislation removing conversion therapy restrictions
Kentucky lawmakers passed a measure Friday seeking to protect the controversial practice known as conversion therapy for LGBTQ youth, repealing an executive order from Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear ...The Hill - 1h -
Trump must understand Putin ‘respects strength’ during talks over Ukraine war: Fmr. Amb. to Russia
Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul discusses the call between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin and what talks could mean for the end of the war in Ukraine.NBC News - 1h