Here are the cases left to be decided by the Supreme Court
![Here are the cases left to be decided by the Supreme Court](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/06/scotus_062724gn02_w.jpg?w=900)
The Supreme Court has roughly a handful of opinions left to be handed down before the end of its term, which will now stretch into July.
They include history-making decisions such as former President Trump’s criminal immunity defense claims, the validity of a charge levied against more than 300 Jan. 6 defendants and the potential demise of a major administrative law known as the Chevron deference.
Technically, the court has eight argued cases remaining. But a few of those cases may be merged into a singular opinion, such as the case involving Chevron and a set of challenges to social media moderation in Florida and Texas, so the expectation is that six total decisions remain.
The court will release opinions on Friday morning and now on Monday morning, missing its traditional end-of-June deadline. The last day of the term has yet to be officially determined.
Here is the full list of cases still before the high court.
Trump immunity (Trump v. United States)
The justices let the first presidential debate pass by on Thursday night before handing down their highly anticipated decision on whether Trump has criminal immunity for official acts while in office.
Trump contends his defense would require the dismissal of charges in his three criminal cases that have yet to go to trial, and Trump’s Supreme Court appeal has tied up his federal Jan. 6 case for months.
“Without presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, there can be no presidency as we know it,” D. John Sauer, Trump’s lead attorney in the case, told the Supreme Court at oral arguments.
Michael Dreeben, who argued the case on behalf of special counsel Jack Smith, was spotted in the courtroom on Wednesday when the justices handed down opinions, but immunity has yet to be among those made public so far.
Jan. 6 obstruction charge (Fischer v. United States)
The Justice Department’s sweeping prosecution of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack is further under the microscope with rioter Joseph Fischer’s challenge to an obstruction law that criminalizes “corruptly” obstructing, impeding or interfering with an official government proceeding.
Prosecutors pointed to Congress’s certification of the 2020 presidential election results that day, which formalized President Biden’s win over Trump, as reason to use the charge against Fischer and more than 350 other rioters.
But Fischer contends that the DOJ overreached and improperly applied the law to rioters, pointing to its origin with the Enron accounting scandal, passed to deal with the destruction of documents.
The justices seemed wary of the law’s application during arguments in April, which could spell trouble for the government’s efforts to hold rioters to account and Trump’s federal election subversion case.
Chevron (Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce)
Chevron deference may be on its death bed.
The justices are weighing whether to overrule the precedent, a bedrock of administrative law that has given federal agencies across the government wide authority to enact regulations.
At oral arguments, the conservative majority appeared poised to either limit Chevron’s reach or overrule it entirely, which would dramatically claw back the executive branch’s powers when Congress hasn’t spoken clearly about an issue.
“You say don't overrule Chevron because it would be a shock to the system, but the reality of how this works is Chevron itself ushers in shocks to the system every four or eight years when a new administration comes in,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh told the Biden administration’s lawyer at oral arguments.
Florida, Texas social media cases (NetChoice v. Paxton and Moody v. NetChoice)
Two cases involving the rights of social media companies remain in a Supreme Court term riddled with big questions involving online speech.
Tech industry groups challenged laws in Florida and Texas that seek to bar social media platforms from banning users for their political views, even if platform policies were violated. They say the laws — passed in the wake of the 2020 election, when conservatives feared their views were being unfairly censored by major platforms — trample over private companies’ First Amendment right to decide which content to host.
Several justices expressed concern about the apparent overreach of the laws, pointing to non-traditional platforms like Gmail and the online marketplace Etsy that could face unintended consequences should the justices rule in favor of the states. Kavanaugh specifically raised that the First Amendment was designed to protect companies from government overreach – not the other way around.
Ticketing the homeless (City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson)
Americans without housing could face new restrictions if the Supreme Court rules in favor of an Oregon city cracking down on public sleeping.
The justices are weighing whether cities can ticket homeless people for camping in public if no alternative shelter is available to them after the city of Grants Pass, Oregon sought to implement a law that would fine campers $295 per night for sleeping in public parks.
A lower court ruled that the law amounts to cruel and unusual punishment, which the city claims prevents it from implementing “common sense” laws to combat public camping.
With rates of homelessness at record levels across the country, the justices’ ruling stands to dramatically alter the lives of Americans without a permanent place to live. During arguments, several justices acknowledged the complicated nature of the issue.
Statute of limitations (Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System)
Among the Supreme Court’s final remaining cases will resolve a split among the nations’ federal appeals courts as to when plaintiffs can challenge government regulations in court.
Some lower courts — and the Biden administration — believe the six-year statute of limitations clock begins ticking when a federal agency issues its regulation.
But Corner Post, a North Dakota truck stop, believes the timer doesn’t start until it is first adversely affected by the regulation, a theory that would open up regulations to additional lawsuits.
Corner Post opened its doors in 2018 and is attempting to challenge Federal Reserve’s regulations of maximum debit card “swipe fees,” which were issued seven years earlier.
Date: |
Topics
Filter
-
The Wall Street Journal - World
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Trump's Prosecution, Ruling He Has Broad Immunity
The court said that former U.S. presidents retain significant immunity from prosecution for acts taken while in office, a decision that threatens to hamper efforts to prosecute Donald Trump for his alleged attempt to subvert the 2020 election.Donald Trump -
MarketWatch - Business
Trump’s legal cases: Here’s where they stand post-debate and before the Supreme Court immunity decision
Donald Trump’s ongoing court cases got some airtime during the first matchup with President Joe Biden of 2024 -
CBS News - Top stories
Supreme Court rules on abortion, Purdue Pharma cases
On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court released more major decisions on multiple cases as the term nears its end. The justices blocked the $6 billion settlement by the makers of the drug oxycontin because it also shielded members of the Sackler ...Abortion -
The Wall Street Journal - World
The Supreme Court's Notable Cases of the 2023-24 Term
The court has wrapped up a term that included blockbuster cases about former President Donald Trump, hot-button social issues, questions of free speech and matters of importance to the business community. -
The Hill - Politics
READ: Supreme Court ruling in Trump immunity case
The Supreme Court on Monday issued its ruling, a 6-3 vote, in the highly anticipated case to determine whether presidents have immunity in their actions, official and unofficial. Former President Trump’s claimed he had presidential immunity from ...Donald Trump -
CNBC - Business
Supreme Court punts social media moderation cases back to lower courts
The Supreme Court on Monday kicked issues around social media content moderation back to lower courts for further review. -
The New York Times - Top stories
Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Sleeping Outdoors in Homelessness Case
The case is likely to have broad ramifications for how cities across the country respond to homelessness. -
The Hill - Politics
Supreme Court takes sledgehammer to federal agency power in Chevron case
The Supreme Court took a sledgehammer to executive agencies’ power Friday by overruling a prominent precedent that bolstered their ability to implement regulations in wide areas of American life, including consumer and environmental protections. ... -
The New York Times - Top stories
Supreme Court Says Prosecutors Overstepped With Jan. 6 Charge
The ruling that the Justice Department misused a 2002 law in charging a pro-Trump rioter who entered the Capitol could have an impact on hundreds of other cases, including one against Donald Trump.
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Psaki defends debate prep team: 'Biden was bad'
MSNBC anchor Jen Psaki, who once served as President Biden's press secretary, defended his campaign amid criticism of the president's debate performance last week, instead pinning the blame on the president. Psaki said it is “absurd” to blame ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Head of Trump PAC predicts 'cannibalistic chaos' if Dems replace Biden
The head of the primary super PAC supporting former President Trump said the potential replacement of President Biden as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee would be “impossible” to carry out and essentially spell defeat for the party in ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Doubts have grown over Biden's mental fitness: Poll
Voters' doubts about President Biden’s fitness to serve in the Oval Office have grown over the past few months, according to a new poll released Monday amid the fallout from his shaky debate performance last week. The latest Harvard CAPS-Harris ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Trump lead over Biden unchanged since debate: Poll
Former President Trump’s lead over President Biden in national polling is unchanged following the debate between the candidates last week, according to a new survey. The Harvard CAPS/Harris poll released Monday, which was conducted after the ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Luttig: Trump, other presidents now 'above the law'
Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig said former President Trump and other U.S. presidents can now be considered "above the law" after the Supreme Court ruled Monday that core presidential powers are immune from prosecution. “It can never again ...Donald Trump