Free speech hypocrisy at Wash U
The Hill recently published an essay by Chancellor Andrew Martin of Washington University in St. Louis, where I am a faculty member. I agree with Martin’s thesis while interpreting it entirely differently. After last academic year’s season of protest against the genocide in Gaza, “this year must be different.”
We disagree on how it must be different, because the chancellor feels that student protests should be even more tightly restrained than last year’s violently subdued protests. Oddly, this sentiment rebuts Martin’s own reputation as a free speech absolutist, with which he arrived at Wash U.
“We’re not bound by the First Amendment, unlike a public university,” he told our school newspaper, but “I think that the right policy is for us to behave as if we are.” The context was his decision as a dean at University of Michigan to host the infamous white nationalist Richard Spencer. Martin doubled down when he required all Wash U freshmen to read a book by former ACLU head Nadine Strossen that argues that legal cases like a New York court’s 1961 decision to allow a Nazi rally are essential for democracy.
But those precedents didn’t stop him from taking an action he omits from his essay. In April, he ordered the arrest of over 100 people on the campus for a student-led nonviolent protest in solidarity with Palestine, including Wash U students, alumni, faculty from multiple universities and Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein.
A strange paradox: in his freshman year, my former student Caleb Hughes was required by Martin to read a book insisting that free society tolerates Nazi protests. A year after Caleb graduated, Martin had him arrested for pro-Palestinian protest.
Because that protest showed no evidence of violence or vandalism, the mass arrest was widely criticized by newspapers, civil rights organizations and politicians across the St. Louis area, and by Wash U faculty and alumni. The arrests caused the hospitalization of a professor from a nearby university; the banning from campus of the president of the St. Louis Board of Alderman; and the suspension and banning of multiple Wash U faculty and students, many of whom were scheduled to graduate.
The historically passive Wash U faculty rallied the Faculty Senate to intervene in the administration’s disciplinary response, but the Board of Trustees summarily rebuffed the bid. Martin called in his essay for universities to “model active listening” in difficult times. He didn’t specify who talks and who listens.
That lack of specificity represents a national trend. Over the summer, university administrations revised expressive speech policies at over 100 campuses with restrictions so broad they could foreclose most forms of protest. They’ve demanded protests be registered in advance, limited hours when protests may occur, banned megaphones and restricted flyers and signage.
Administrators like Martin typically rationalize these contradictions of their professed values through strategically vague abstraction. Having long decried undergrads for anti-speech illiberalism, they now discover abundant boundaries on expressive speech.
“Free expression is foundational to education,” Martin writes, but “has limits…Behavior or speech that threatens, intimidates, harasses, discriminates or unreasonably disrupts teaching and learning cannot be tolerated.” Fair enough.
But how do we define “threaten,” “disrupt” and “reasonable?” Laws invoking such terms offer definitional criteria nowhere to be found in Wash U’s and other schools' conduct codes. And who decides if these criteria were met? At campuses across the country, administrators and trustees will deliberate behind closed doors and pronounce from on high what speech does or doesn’t violate invisible criteria of offense.
Consider the two justifications that Martin offers for suppressing free speech. First, he singles out encampments as uniquely disruptive forms of protest. But from Revolutionary Boston to MLK’s lunch counter sit-ins to the Berkeley Free Speech Movement (where campus activism was born), the occupation of public space has been a cornerstone of American social movements. This is presumably why Martin himself previously allowed a protest encampment advocating for a living wage for campus employees at Wash U, even meeting with the campers. Why was that encampment acceptable when the pro-Palestinian one wasn’t?
Second, the chancellor insists that protests cannot “instill fear.” But how do we decide if something inherent to the protest instills fear? Wash U administrators have provided no examples of threatening behavior from protesters, instead citing 911 calls from bystanders terrified by loud chanting. By this standard, surely someone has expressed fear at any protest ever worth the name.
What’s more, this argument — that the sole criteria of a speech act’s threat is whether a listener feels threatened — is the exact doctrine that Strossen and similar campus free speech advocates identify as the greatest threat to free expression. Martin appeared to agree when telling Michigan students terrified of a white nationalist guest speaker that they were in no danger. Why isn’t a Richard Spencer speech a threat when a pro-Palestine chant is?
These contradictory standards display what activists call “the Palestine exception.” Self-declared defenders of free speech suppressed protests against the slaughter in Gaza because of ideological content, and in this respect Wash U joins its peer institutions.
But the Palestinian cause won’t be the only example of such hypocrisy. Many university administrations decided last year that calling the police is effective PR management. If that goes uncorrected, expect more causes to join Gaza on the roster of implicitly forbidden subjects. The emergent doctrine of American universities is “free speech for me but not for thee.”
Let this year be different indeed.
Michael O’Bryan is a senior lecturer in the English Department at Washington University in St. Louis.
Date: |
Topics
-
CBS News - Top stories
Netanyahu addresses United Nations as Israel continues targeting Hezbollah
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly on Friday, remaining defiant about Israel's military operations in the Middle East that appear to be escalating. CBS ...5 hours ago - Israel -
The New York Times - Top stories
Thousands Protest in Manhattan Ahead of Netanyahu’s U.N. Speech
About a dozen people were arrested as demonstrators moved through the streets, condemning the Israeli prime minister over the country’s strikes on Lebanon and Gaza.17 hours ago -
NBC News - Top stories
CBS announces rules for Vance-Walz vice presidential debate
Harris seeks to tackle a political vulnerability on visit to southern border10 hours ago -
The New York Times - World
Netanyahu, Set to Give U.N. Speech, Vows to Keep Up Strikes on Hezbollah
The Israeli leader, who arrived in New York for the U.N. General Assembly, said, “We continue to hit Hezbollah with all our might.”12 hours ago -
The New York Times - Top stories
McDonald’s, Pelosi, Debate Moderators: Trump Speech on Border Veers Off Course
After reading from prepared remarks on immigration for 10 minutes, Donald J. Trump used the rest of a news conference to talk about everything else on his mind.20 hours ago - Donald Trump -
Wired - Tech
How to Get Your 4 Free At-Home Covid-19 Tests (2023)
The US is offering four more at-home tests to every household. Here's how to get yours.Yesterday - Covid -
VentureBeat - Tech
Here’s how to try Meta’s new Llama 3.2 with vision for free
Discover how to access Meta's advanced Llama 3.2 Vision AI model for free through Together AI's demo, enabling developers to explore cutting-edge multimodal AI capabilities without cost barriers.22 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
NYPD’s ‘get out of jail free’ cards are real — and they’re wrong
Traditional or not, the “courtesy card” system is the rankest form of corruption. That it is institutionalized corruption makes it worse.8 hours ago -
The Guardian - World
Leverkusen must address deficiencies to keep free-scoring Bayern at bay
Bundesliga holders have made a slightly erratic start to season before Saturday’s clash with Harry Kane and co. Saturday 12 May 2012. Not just a disappointing result but the final humiliation in a ...5 hours ago
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Israel seeks decisive blow with attack targeting Nasrallah
Israel on Friday sought to deal a decisive blow to Hezbollah by targeting the Iranian-backed group’s long-time leader Hassan Nasrallah, underscoring its willingness to escalate warfare in the ...33 minutes ago - Israel -
The Hill - Politics
Watch live: Trump hosts town hall in southern Michigan
Former President Trump will continue his battleground tour Friday in Michigan, hosting a town hall in a suburb of Detroit a day after absentee ballots were first mailed out. The economy and the ...34 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Watch live: Harris visits southern border
Vice President Harris will make a campaign stop Friday in southern Arizona, giving remarks from a town along the U.S.-Mexico border. During the visit to Douglas, Ariz., the Democratic presidential ...34 minutes ago - Kamala Harris -
The Hill - Politics
Evening Report — Harris the border hawk?
🌀 Plus: Death toll rises from Hurricane Helene {beacon} View Evening Report © AP Harris to strike hawkish tone at Southern border Vice President Harris will strike a hawkish tone on illegal ...44 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
More than 3 million without power after Helene landfall
More than 3 million Americans in the Southeast reported power outages related to Hurricane Helene on Friday, with states on the eastern seaboard from Florida to Virginia reporting more than 100,000 ...59 minutes ago