Forcing women back into the office will cost us millions
As companies and government agencies push forward with return-to-office mandates, they risk exacerbating a workplace problem that many have failed to address adequately: sex discrimination.
New research from the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management highlights how in-person work environments expose women to significantly higher levels of workplace bias and mistreatment compared to remote work. These findings present a serious challenge for leaders who insist on full-time office work without considering the consequences — both ethical and financial.
Beyond harming employee morale and retention, a failure to address sex discrimination in the workplace increases the risk of costly lawsuits and reputational damage. Ultimately, companies like Amazon and government agencies enforcing in-office work policies will not only jeopardize workplace equity but also impose significant financial burdens on shareholders and taxpayers.
A study conducted by professors Laura Doering and András Tilcsik at the Rotman School of Management surveyed over 1,000 professional women in hybrid roles. Their research found that discrimination was nearly twice as common in the office as it was when working remotely. When women worked on-site, 31 percent reported experiencing discrimination, compared to just 17 percent when working remotely.
The disparities were even more pronounced for women in male-dominated workplaces. Among those who worked primarily or exclusively with men, the likelihood of facing sex discrimination in the office skyrocketed to 58 percent, compared to only 26 percent when working remotely. These findings suggest that physical office environments exacerbate existing biases and create conditions where discrimination flourishes.
Younger women, particularly those under 30, were also more vulnerable to workplace mistreatment. The study found that 31 percent of younger women reported experiencing discrimination on-site, compared to just 14 percent when working remotely. This highlights how return-to-office policies disproportionately affect early-career women, potentially discouraging them from remaining in their roles or even in their industries.
The types of discrimination women faced were not limited to isolated incidents. The study assessed 11 different forms of gender-based mistreatment, including inappropriate attention, having ideas ignored or stolen, being assigned non-promotable tasks, exclusion from workplace discussions, and being addressed with sexist language in meetings. These everyday slights contribute to a toxic work culture that erodes job satisfaction and increases burnout.
A case in point: Tata Consultancy Services. The 600,000-employee Indian multinational firm mandated a full-time return to the office in 2023. Within a year, reported cases of sexual harassment more than doubled. This aligns with the findings from the Rotman study, suggesting that office environments often lack the safeguards necessary to prevent discrimination. If companies and agencies enforcing in-office work mandates fail to address these risks, they could find themselves facing a wave of legal challenges similar to the one Tata has faced.
Forcing employees into an environment where they are more likely to face discrimination is not just an ethical issue — it also represents a legal and financial risk. Companies and government agencies that ignore the warnings from the research could face an increase in discrimination lawsuits, which come with steep financial penalties.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission consistently reports high settlement costs for such discrimination cases. In 2024 alone, the commission secured $700 million in monetary benefits for victims of discrimination, including sex-based workplace discrimination. These cases not only result in financial settlements, but also cause companies to incur costly legal fees, reputational damage and increased employee turnover, which further drives up operational expenses.
More broadly, companies are facing record average damages from lawsuits recently, with damages growing faster than inflation.
The financial burden of full-time return-to-office policies does not fall solely on company executives or agency leaders. It ultimately affects shareholders and taxpayers. Publicly traded companies like Amazon, which has faced backlash for its aggressive back-to-the-office push, risk seeing their stock prices decline due to legal liabilities and employee attrition. Shareholders will bear the cost of lost productivity, settlement payouts, and damaged brand reputation.
For the federal government and state government agencies mandating full-time office work, taxpayers are the ones who will foot the bill for discrimination lawsuits, increased turnover, and reduced workforce efficiency. Federal agencies already struggle with sex discrimination cases. A return-to-office policy that exacerbates these problems could lead to more claims, higher legal fees, and costly settlements funded by taxpayer dollars.
Beyond legal costs, the productivity losses associated with workplace discrimination are substantial. Research from the Center for American Progress estimates that replacing a single employee costs organizations approximately 20 percent of that worker’s annual salary. When discrimination and burnout push women out of their jobs, companies and agencies must expend additional resources for recruitment, onboarding, and training — all of which could have been avoided by fostering a more inclusive and flexible work environment.
Despite these risks, some executives continue to frame back-to-the-office mandates as productivity-boosting. But research consistently shows that flexible work options enhance employee well-being and reduce workplace bias. The Rotman study’s findings reinforce that remote work serves as a protective shield against gender discrimination, allowing women to focus on their contributions rather than navigating a hostile work environment.
This does not mean that remote work should be used as an excuse to avoid addressing discrimination. Instead, it underscores the need for companies and agencies to tackle the root causes of workplace bias before enforcing in-office mandates. Implementing stronger anti-discrimination policies, holding leadership accountable, and fostering an inclusive culture are critical steps.
For organizations that choose to ignore these warnings, the consequences will be severe. Increased legal liabilities, talent attrition, and reputational damage are all on the horizon for those who fail to create safe and equitable workplaces. The costs of full-time office mandates — both financial and cultural — will ultimately be borne by shareholders and taxpayers, making it imperative for leaders to rethink their approach.
In an era when workplace equity is under increasing scrutiny, forcing employees back into environments where discrimination thrives is a risk no organization can afford to take.
Gleb Tsipursky, Ph.D., serves as the CEO of the hybrid work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts and authored the best-seller "Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams."
-
Ontario says it will slap a 25% surcharge on US-bound electricity
The move is in retaliation to Trump's tariff threats on Canada, and is expected to raise energy costs for 1.5 million US homes.BBC News - 1d -
Typing loudly, wearing AirPods: ‘taskmasking’ is how gen Z pretends to work at the office
As more companies mandate a return to the office, young workers learn to game the system to take back control. As employers crack down on hybrid work, insisting that the US corporate class head ...The Guardian - 1d -
A new car costs nearly $50,000 on average: Here’s how much you'd pay per month
The cost of a new car could set you back $1,000 per month—here’s how to lower costs.CNBC - 3d -
In a big step for Syria, U.S.-backed Kurdish forces will merge with government army
The Kurdish-led coalition that with U.S. troops fought Islamic State, will integrate with the Syrian government forces previously affiliated with Al Qaeda.NBC News - 16h -
US taxpayers have shelled out tens of millions of dollars for Trump’s golf trips
The president, who derided Barack Obama for golfing while in office, even makes money off his Mar-a-Lago weekends. It has become a familiar routine for the Palm Beach county sheriff, Ric Bradshaw, ...The Guardian - 2d -
The body of a Kenyan officer who died in Haiti arrives home for burial
The body of a Kenyan police officer who died in Haiti’s UN-backed multinational mission to combat violent gangs has been returned homeABC News - 18h -
Celebrations and protests in the US and around the world mark International Women’s Day
From Istanbul and Warsaw to New York and Los Angeles, activists demand equality and the end of gender-based violence. Women took to the streets of cities across Europe, Africa and elsewhere to mark ...The Guardian - 3d -
Bills to release LB Von Miller in salary cap cost-saving move
Releasing Miller will save the Bills $8.5 million in salary cap space.Yahoo Sports - 2d -
UCLA, South Carolina move atop women's Top 25
UCLA vaulted back up to No. 1 in The Associated Press women's basketball Top 25 on Monday after beating USC for the Big Ten title over the weekend.ESPN - 1d
More from The Hill
-
Judge declines to block DOGE from taking over African development agency
A federal judge on Tuesday declined to block the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from taking over the U.S. African Development Foundation (USADF). U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ...The Hill - 1h -
Lutnick says Trump tariffs 'worth it' even if they lead to recession
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that President Trump’s tariff policies will be worth it, even if the economy ends up in a recession. In an interview that aired Tuesday, CBS News’s ...The Hill - 1h -
Democrat wins special election for Minnesota state House seat
Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) candidate David Gottfried is projected to win a special election for a seat in the Minnesota House, according to Decision Desk HQ. Gottfried, a pro bono ...The Hill - 2h -
GOP Rep. Mark Harris says Trump has done 'tremendous job' making case against Education Department
Rep. Mark Harris (R-N.C.) said on Tuesday that President Trump successfully made the case against the Department of Education during his 2024 campaign, leading more Republicans to support the ...The Hill - 2h -
Sununu on possible Senate bid: 'I have not ruled it out completely'
Former New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R) said he is considering running for Senate after previously rejecting the possibility. “I have not ruled it out completely, but folks in Washington have ...The Hill - 4h
More in Politics
-
Judge declines to block DOGE from taking over African development agency
A federal judge on Tuesday declined to block the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from taking over the U.S. African Development Foundation (USADF). U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ...The Hill - 1h -
Lutnick says Trump tariffs 'worth it' even if they lead to recession
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that President Trump’s tariff policies will be worth it, even if the economy ends up in a recession. In an interview that aired Tuesday, CBS News’s ...The Hill - 1h -
Democrat wins special election for Minnesota state House seat
Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) candidate David Gottfried is projected to win a special election for a seat in the Minnesota House, according to Decision Desk HQ. Gottfried, a pro bono ...The Hill - 2h -
GOP Rep. Mark Harris says Trump has done 'tremendous job' making case against Education Department
Rep. Mark Harris (R-N.C.) said on Tuesday that President Trump successfully made the case against the Department of Education during his 2024 campaign, leading more Republicans to support the ...The Hill - 2h -
USAID staff instructed to clear out classified safes and shred or burn documents
"Shred as many documents first, and reserve the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable or needs a break," the email reads.CBS News - 3h