Firing of whistleblower protection office head unlawful, judge rules
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3950/a3950b7e1d30c2f09995261c727b14c9df0a305d" alt="Firing of whistleblower protection office head unlawful, judge rules"
A federal judge on Saturday ruled that President Trump’s firing of the head of an office designed to protect government whistleblowers was unlawful.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled in favor of Hampton Dellinger, director of the Office of Special Counsel, who said he was fired from his post in a one-sentence email. An appointee of former President Biden, he argued that the firing violated his appointment to a five-year term in the office.
A temporary restraining order was scheduled to expire Wednesday but Jackson extended it to Saturday as she weighed the further relief.
"There is no dispute that the statute establishing the Office of Special Counsel provides that the Special Counsel may be removed by the President only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office, and that the curt email from the White House informing the Special Counsel that he was terminated contained no reasons whatsoever,” Jackson wrote.
The Office of Special Counsel, which is different from Justice Department special counsels like Jack Smith, enables whistleblowers to report potential government wrongdoing and works to protect them from retaliation. It also responds to potential violations of the Hatch Act, the law that guards against electioneering by federal employees.
Joshua Matz, a lawyer for Dellinger, argued Wednesday that the Office of Special Counsel is not a “pure extension” of the executive branch. It plays a “significant role” in reporting to Congress, existing to ensure the legislative branch knows if executive agencies are interfering with its attempts to protect whistleblowers, he said.
“The independence that exists here is about ensuring that whistleblowers who are going to report retaliation or inappropriate political activity can do so without fear of retaliation,” Matz said, questioning why a president who swore to faithfully execute the law would want to eliminate a haven for whistleblowers.
Dellinger’s attorneys said that he is an "inferior officer,” which they argue means that Congress sets the terms of removal from the office — not the executive.
DOJ lawyer Madeline McMahon contrarily argued that Dellinger holds “core executive” powers and authority, including enforcement of four federal statutes and a “roving investigatory function.”
She also said that the government’s position is that the president, under his authority to supervise the executive branch, has a “limitless” ability to remove direct subordinates for “any reason at all.” To let Dellinger stay would undercut that power, she argued.
Jackson sharply pushed back on that assertion, contending that the president has “a lot of power” already to remove the official, if he’s done something wrong.
“He can remove him in situations where he's acting arbitrarily or negligently or corruptly, if he's done something wrong, something to give us concern – give the president concern,” the judge said. “All the hand wringing about the fact that somebody can't be out there that the president can't control is not true. He has removal power.
“What we're talking about is just a little piece of that, the narrow question about whether a president should be able to fire this particular person for no reason whatsoever,” she said.
McMahon said the judge does not have authority to grant injunctive relief, because any such order would “disable” Trump’s power to remove Dellinger and select someone else to fill that office.
Dellinger’s case already reached the Supreme Court, the first of several lawsuits challenging Trump’s firings of independent federal agency leaders with statutory removal protections.
The justices punted on the administration’s request to wipe the lower court’s temporary reinstatement of the official, holding in “abeyance” Trump’s emergency application until the lower court’s order expired Wednesday, effectively pushing off deciding whether the firing was legal.
When Jackson extended her temporary restraining order, she acknowledged the “unusual posture” of the case, given its early trip to the Supreme Court, and said she would rule “expeditiously” while still giving “full consideration” to all the arguments.
Democratic appointees to multimember commissions like the Merit Systems Protection Board, National Labor Relations Board and Federal Labor Relations Authority have also challenged their firings.
Topics
-
Judge rules that Trump's firing of whistleblower office chief was unlawful
Hampton Dellinger, who leads the Office of Special Counsel, sued President Trump last month after he was fired.CBS News - 22h -
Judge extends block on firing head of whistleblower protection office by three days
A federal judge on Wednesday extended an order barring President Trump from firing the head of an office designed to protect government whistleblowers by three days as she weighs further relief. ...The Hill - 4d -
US supreme court temporarily blocks firing of head of federal whistleblower protection office
Trump administration is seeking to oust Hampton Dellinger, head of the office of special counsel. The US supreme court on Friday temporarily kept on the job the head of the federal agency that ...The Guardian - Feb. 22 -
Trump's effort to fire government watchdog 'unlawful', judge rules
President Donald Trump's effort to remove the head of a federal watchdog agency was "unlawful," a federal judge in Washington, D.C., said Saturday.NBC News - 21h -
Trump 2nd term live updates: Judge rules Trump's firing of watchdog was unlawful
Trump’s efforts to reshape the federal government suffered a loss in court when a judge blocked his administration from firing the head of a federal watchdog agency.ABC News - 1h -
Judge Rules Trump Can’t Fire Head of Federal Watchdog Agency Without Cause
A federal judge said that the president’s efforts to remove Hampton Dellinger, who leads the Office of Special Counsel, were unlawful. The agency protects whistle-blowers.The New York Times - 20h -
Federal judge rules Trump administration can fire career intel officers who had DEI jobs
A judge ruled the Trump administration can fire dozens of intelligence officers with CIA and ODNI who had temporary assignments working on diversity programs.NBC News - 3d -
Supreme Court stiffs Trump, punts on firing whistleblower agency head
The Supreme Court stiffed President Trump in his administration’s first high court appeal by punting Friday on a request to greenlight the firing of the head of a whistleblower protection office. ...The Hill - Feb. 22 -
Supreme Court declines to intervene for now in bid to fire whistleblower office chief
President Trump removed Hampton Dellinger from his position as special counsel on Feb. 7, but a federal judge ordered him to be reinstated for a short period.CBS News - Feb. 21
More from The Hill
-
Most Americans in new survey support funding increases as Trump admin seeks cuts
Far more Americans support increasing federal funding in key areas than those who favor decreasing funding, according to a new survey, even as the Trump administration seeks sweeping cuts to ...The Hill - 1h -
Only 4 percent of Americans back Russia in war, but 44 percent don't back Ukraine either: Poll
Only 4 percent of surveyed Americans said they are backing Russia in the war in Ukraine, but 44 percent said they also don’t back Ukraine in a CBS News/YouGov poll. In the poll, which took place ...The Hill - 1h -
The Oscars 2025: How to watch, and when the show begins
This will mark the culmination of one of the most topsy-turvey Oscars seasons Hollywood has ever seen. So how can you catch all the action?The Hill - 2h -
Americans largely split on who should have birthright citizenship: Survey
Americans are largely split on which groups of children they think should automatically become citizens, according to a new YouGov survey. The survey, released Friday, includes 51 percent of ...The Hill - 2h -
GOP chairmen urge leader to battle House on budget, spending strategy
Senate Republican committee chairs delivered a blunt message to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) last week that they want the Senate to assert itself and not let the White House and ...The Hill - 2h
More in Politics
-
White House faces growing backlash over cuts to federal workforce
The White House is facing growing backlash to the Trump administration's cuts to the federal workforce, including demonstrations at national parks, along with a legal setback that could eventually ...NBC News - 34m -
Most Americans in new survey support funding increases as Trump admin seeks cuts
Far more Americans support increasing federal funding in key areas than those who favor decreasing funding, according to a new survey, even as the Trump administration seeks sweeping cuts to ...The Hill - 1h -
Only 4 percent of Americans back Russia in war, but 44 percent don't back Ukraine either: Poll
Only 4 percent of surveyed Americans said they are backing Russia in the war in Ukraine, but 44 percent said they also don’t back Ukraine in a CBS News/YouGov poll. In the poll, which took place ...The Hill - 1h -
The Oscars 2025: How to watch, and when the show begins
This will mark the culmination of one of the most topsy-turvey Oscars seasons Hollywood has ever seen. So how can you catch all the action?The Hill - 2h -
Americans largely split on who should have birthright citizenship: Survey
Americans are largely split on which groups of children they think should automatically become citizens, according to a new YouGov survey. The survey, released Friday, includes 51 percent of ...The Hill - 2h