Don’t be fooled by double-speak on Trump’s transgender military ban
As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, I have witnessed firsthand how policies affecting transgender service members impact our military readiness.
In 2016, the country made a commitment to transgender Americans, allowing them to serve in the military as transgender people. Many relied on that promise, taking the military at its word. There are brave transgender men and women serving today who held up their end of the bargain.
They transitioned during military service and continue in the military serving with distinction and meeting the rigorous standards applied to all who wear the uniform.
When President Trump announced in 2017 that transgender people would be banned from service, the 2018 Mattis Policy was developed to carry out that ban. And let's be clear about what that policy actually did. Although it allowed a small group of transgender service members who had already transitioned to continue serving, it barred anyone else who came after them from doing so.
No other transgender person in service was permitted to transition and live as transgender in the military. No transgender person who had transitioned could newly join the military. It was a ban on transgender individuals serving as transgender individuals.
In 2021, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin reversed that ban, allowing transgender people to serve if they meet the military's rigorous standards. Now, as Trump promises again to prohibit transgender people from serving, we must not be fooled if the military comes forward with another version of the Mattis Policy. Any policy that prevents transgender people from serving as transgender people — whether through an outright ban or through requirements to serve in one's birth sex — is a ban, plain and simple.
The suggestion that transgender service members could simply serve in their birth sex fundamentally misunderstands what it means to be transgender.
While every transgender person has, at some point, lived in their birth sex — as everyone has — the point of gender transition is to live in a different sex. That's what makes someone transgender: living in, or seeking to live in if one could, a sex different from their birth sex. Requiring service in one's birth sex requires a transgender individual to suppress being transgender — echoing the goal of discredited conversion therapy practices.
The cost to our nation's defense of a ban is substantial and multifaceted. First, we lose qualified service members who are meeting and exceeding our standards. These are pilots, cyber specialists, medical professionals and leaders at every level — individuals in whom we have invested millions in training and development. This investment isn't just financial; it represents years of specialized training intended to build the next generation of military leadership.
But the damage runs deeper than the immediate loss of talent. When we depart from merit-based standards, we undermine the very foundation of military excellence. Our service members strive for excellence not just because it's in their warrior DNA, but because they operate within a system that has historically rewarded contribution based on performance.
When we institute blanket bans based on a service member’s identity, we don't just hurt the directly affected individuals — we erode the motivation and trust of every service member who believes in the fundamental fairness of our military.
The impact on recruitment and retention cannot be overstated. My work on the Armed Services Committee has shown that young Americans are acutely aware of how we treat their peers. When we tell qualified individuals they cannot serve as transgender people, even though they meet all standards, we send a message that resonates far beyond the transgender community. Non-transgender young Americans increasingly choose not to serve in an institution they perceive as unfair or unprincipled.
In an era where ensuring the nation’s security turns on our meeting recruitment goals, we cannot afford to alienate talented individuals who are eager to serve their country.
Perhaps most critically, discriminatory policies strike at the heart of military readiness itself. A military that does not reflect the society it serves risks becoming insular and self-protective rather than focused on its core mission of national defense. This shift from protecting our nation to protecting its own institutional biases is the antithesis of readiness and lethality. Our military's strength has always come from its ability to draw from the full spectrum of American talent and experience.
We cannot return to policies that ban transgender service while claiming to do otherwise. Our military's effectiveness depends on its ability to attract and retain the best qualified individuals, regardless of personal characteristics. Any policy that undermines this principle — that suggests discrimination can coexist with excellence — fundamentally misunderstands what makes our military strong.
The choice before us is clear: We can maintain a military that rewards merit and builds strength through inclusion, or we can embrace discrimination and watch our readiness erode. The safety and security of our nation, as well as the preservation of our national values, rests on us choosing merit and strength over class-based exclusions.
Gil Cisneros represents California’s 31st District and is a member of the House Armed Services Committee
Topics
-
Trump threatens to withhold federal funds from Maine over transgender athletes
President Trump is threatening to withhold federal funds from Maine if it continues allowing transgender athletes to compete in girls’ and women’s sports in defiance of a recent executive order. ...The Hill - 5d -
'We are the federal law': Trump, Maine governor clash over transgender athletes
President Trump and Maine’s Democratic Gov. Janet Mills briefly quarreled Friday at a National Governors Association session at the White House after Trump told a meeting of Republican governors he ...The Hill - 5d -
Trump spars with Maine’s governor at the White House over transgender athletes
Trump sparred with Maine’s Democratic governor during a meeting of governors at the White House, with Gov. Janet Mills telling the Trump, “We’ll see you in court,” over his push to deny federal ...NBC News - 4d -
Federal Judge Shields More Transgender Inmates From Trump Order
A group of transgender women in federal prisons who would have been moved into men’s facilities can stay where they are for now.The New York Times - 1d -
Bondi warns states to comply with Trump order on transgender athletes
Attorney General Pam Bondi warned officials in Maine, California and Minnesota on Tuesday to comply with President Trump’s executive orders to bar transgender athletes from participating in girls’ ...The Hill - 20h -
Trump Plans to Use Military Bases to Detain Migrants
Also, archaeologists found a pharaoh’s tomb. Here’s the latest at the end of Friday.The New York Times - 4d -
Trump shakes up top military leadership
Late Friday night, President Trump fired General Charles "C.Q." Brown, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called for the firing last year due to Brown's ...CBS News - 4d -
Judge Blocks Trump Bid to Ban DEI
A Maryland judge said the DEI directives by Trump likely violate the First Amendment.Inc. - 4d -
Judge temporarily blocks Trump refugee ban
A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from suspending the U.S. refugee program, siding with resettlement groups that challenged a Day One order from the president. U.S. ...The Hill - 23h
More from The Hill
-
Trump says Zeldin plans to cut up to 65 percent of EPA staff
President Trump said Wednesday that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin has floated cutting the agency’s workforce by up to 65 percent. Speaking at the inaugural Cabinet ...The Hill - 33m -
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK is upending British politics
Over the past decade and a half, much of the world has entered a new form of politics in which results must be delivered faster and better than before.The Hill - 33m -
Interior halts employee spending and travel
The Interior Department has paused spending and travel for employees — a move that could potentially hinder scientific work at the agency. An email viewed by The Hill shows that spending limits on ...The Hill - 34m -
Senate confirms top Trump trade negotiator
The Senate voted to confirm a trade attorney and first-term Trump official for the position of America’s top trade negotiator as the Trump administration looks set to reconsider long-standing ...The Hill - 43m -
House Democrats call on Trump to rescind order against gender-affirming care
More than 80 House Democrats are calling on President Trump to revoke an executive order to broadly restrict access to gender-affirming health care for transgender young people, alleging the ...The Hill - 46m
More in Politics
-
Dozens of DOGE ‘receipts’ saved no money and killed contracts meant to boost efficiency
Take a quick look at the Department of Government Efficiency’s list of canceled contracts and you’d think the Agriculture Department spent $25 million on diversity trainings four separate times, ...NBC News - 8m -
Trump says Zeldin plans to cut up to 65 percent of EPA staff
President Trump said Wednesday that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin has floated cutting the agency’s workforce by up to 65 percent. Speaking at the inaugural Cabinet ...The Hill - 33m -
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK is upending British politics
Over the past decade and a half, much of the world has entered a new form of politics in which results must be delivered faster and better than before.The Hill - 33m -
Interior halts employee spending and travel
The Interior Department has paused spending and travel for employees — a move that could potentially hinder scientific work at the agency. An email viewed by The Hill shows that spending limits on ...The Hill - 34m -
Senate confirms top Trump trade negotiator
The Senate voted to confirm a trade attorney and first-term Trump official for the position of America’s top trade negotiator as the Trump administration looks set to reconsider long-standing ...The Hill - 43m