Donald Trump’s tariff plan could bring us back to the 1930s
Donald Trump has claimed that Kamala Harris’s economic plan would result in an economic depression on the scale of the Great Depression of 1929. However, a major element of his own economic plan is the imposition of high tariffs on imports, which would be much more likely to lead to a depression than anything Harris is proposing. And there’s historical proof of that.
The stock market crash of October 1929 is generally accepted as the event that began the Great Depression. However, the market had partially rebounded in the first half of 1930, before President Herbert Hoover signed into law the Smoot-Hawley tariff act in June of that year. That act increased tariffs by 20 percent on a wide range of industrial and agricultural products. It was a terribly misguided effort at protecting U.S. producers and reversing the depression. But its effect was to deepen and lengthen it and to spread it globally. From 1929 to 1933, global trade declined from $3 trillion to less than $1 trillion.
Here's how the Smoot-Hawley tariffs backfired:
- By increasing the cost of living. Since tariffs are a tax imposed on American importers (not foreign exporters), they increased the cost of imported products to consumers.
- By hurting U.S. exports. Other countries responded to the tariffs by raising their own tariffs, which severely harmed U.S. manufacturers and farmers.
- By causing additional bank failures. The impact of tariffs on the economy contributed to more bank failures, especially in agricultural areas.
- By reducing domestic consumption. People were forced to reduce consumption of goods, both imported and domestically produced. This led to American manufacturers and farmers selling less at lower prices.
Trump’s tariffs would have the same or greater impact and would repeat Herbert Hoover’s tragic mistake at great cost to America’s industries, workers, farmers and ranchers.
Three other points are worth making.
First, Trump seems to believe that tariffs simply level the playing field with our trading partners and that those nations should have no right to retaliate. But virtually all existing U.S. tariffs are set at levels negotiated with other nations in a series of reciprocal trade agreements beginning after World War II. As a result of those deals, the U.S. gained commitments from other nations to reduce tariffs on American goods. Any increase in U.S. tariffs, therefore, would abrogate those agreements and open the door to commensurate tariff increases on U.S. goods. This would devastate many sectors of the U.S. economy that depend heavily on exports.
Moreover, Trump’s latest proposed tariff of 200 percent on John Deere machinery imported from Mexico would contravene the trade agreement he himself negotiated with Mexico and Canada in 2018 and it would allow Mexico to apply equivalent tariffs on an equal value of U.S. goods. America’s farmers well know that Mexico is the second largest foreign market for their products.
To be clear, tariffs targeted at proven unfair trade practices, such as products subsidized by governments or dumped at less than their cost of production are not the issue. Those are perfectly legitimate, as are existing negotiated tariffs. But unilateral tariffs applied across the board for the purpose of protectionism or revenue generation are dangerous and can be catastrophic.
Further, rather than helping American manufacturing, Trump's tariffs would likely cost more American manufacturing jobs than they will save. Many manufactured parts and agricultural commodities exported to the United States are essential inputs to American manufacturers producing goods here. For example, confectionery companies producing chocolate must import cocoa because it is not grown in North America. Under Trump's tariffs, the price of cocoa rises and imperils jobs at companies like Hershey, Mars and numerous other American confectioners of all sizes. In the end, these indiscriminate, misguided tariffs protect the privileged few at the expense of the many.
Next, let’s settle the question about who pays the tariff. When a foreign product arrives at a U.S. port, the U.S. importer presents to the U.S. Customs Service a bill of lading containing the quantity and value of the product (the amount the importer paid for the product). The Customs Service calculates the applicable tariff for that product and collects it from the importer. The amount collected is sent to the U.S. Treasury, just as are all other federal taxes. The product then enters the U.S. market for sale to consumers at a price that includes the tariff. It is no more complicated than that.
Finally, it appears that Trump’s intention is to use tariffs to accomplish two goals: to reduce imports and to generate “trillions of dollars” of revenue. But doing both could be a challenge. If the tariffs have the effect of reducing imports, less revenue would therefore be generated than might have been hoped. And it should be noted that $28 billion of the revenue collected under Trump’s previous unilateral tariffs on Chinese goods in 2019 had to be used to only partially offset income lost by American farmers when China retaliated against U.S. farm goods, not to pay for new programs.
The Trump tariff plan is a direct threat to American jobs and our global economic leadership — and clearly not a risk worth taking in this era of unpredictable global economic and political stability.
Dan Glickman served as a member of Congress from 1979-1995 and served as secretary of Agriculture during the Clinton administration. Charlie Dent served as a member of Congress from 2005-2018.
Date: | |
Tag: | Donald Trump |
Topics
-
Top stories - The New York Times
Donald Trump, You Lucky Dog
It’s unnerving how many fortunate things have happened to this guy.Yesterday - Donald Trump -
Top stories - The New York Times
Could Trump Really Use the Justice Department to Lock Up His Enemies?
In a survey of 50 members of the D.C. legal establishment, many warn that Trump could follow through on his threats to prosecute his political adversaries.Yesterday - Donald Trump -
Top stories - CBS News
How Donald Trump reacted to Jack Smith's filing
Sources close to Donald Trump say he is angry over special counsel Jack Smith's filing that lays out apparent evidence against the former president in the election interference case. CBS News' ...Yesterday - Donald Trump -
World - The Guardian
Melania Trump says she forced Donald to drop hardline immigration policy
Ex-first lady says she told Trump to stop separating children from parents and addresses jacket controversy in book. Melania Trump describes in her new memoir how she made her husband, then ...Yesterday - Donald Trump -
World - The Guardian
Donald Trump’s foul-mouthed migrant rant captured in private pitch to donors
Republican nominee claims Harris is threat to democracy in recording of top-dollar fundraiser in Colorado in August. US politics – live updates Donald Trump unleashed a foul-mouthed tirade ...12 hours ago - Donald Trump -
World - The Guardian
EU leaders back extra Chinese EV tariffs despite split vote
Decision opposed by five countries including Germany, where car firms say it could be ‘fatal’ blow for industry. Carmakers ramp up pressure on chancellor for EV sales subsidies EU leaders have ...9 hours ago - European Union -
Business - The New York Times
Britain Backs Plan to Store Carbon Dioxide Under the Sea
Two proposals in Northern England, led by the energy giants BP and Eni, aim to establish an industry in burying emissions from industrial plants.4 hours ago - United Kingdom -
Top stories - The New York Times
How Trump Could Punish His Enemies
We look at why legal experts are concerned.Yesterday - Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Debate rages over Israeli response to Iran
Welcome to The Hill's Defense & NatSec newsletter {beacon} Defense &National Security Defense &National Security The Big Story Should Israel strike Iranian oil or nuclear facilities? President ...23 minutes ago - Israel -
Politics - The Hill
Evening Report — Where things stand a month out
🌀 Plus: FEMA funding and fighting falsehoods {beacon} Evening Report26 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Harris meets with Arab American and Muslim leaders in Michigan
Vice President Harris met with leaders from the Muslim and Arab American community while in Flint, Mich., on Friday amid the ongoing war in the Middle East and shrinking support for Democrats from ...31 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Harris gets October Surprise
Welcome to The Hill's Business & Economy newsletter {beacon} Business & Economy Business & Economy The Big Story Harris buoyed by strong jobs report, port strike end An expectation-smashing jobs ...33 minutes ago - Kamala Harris -
Politics - The Hill
Buttigieg dismisses Musk's Helene federal response claims
Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg called out tech giant Elon Musk on Friday for making false claims about the federal government blocking flights with deliveries for Hurricane ...56 minutes ago