DOGE can cut spending, but can it make government more accountable?
![DOGE can cut spending, but can it make government more accountable?](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/02/AP25036628674457-e1739025482140.jpg?w=900)
No matter how you look at it, President Trump is delivering. Depending on which side of the fence you sit on, he is either slashing the budget and saving taxpayers billions or hellbent on retribution, ruining the lives of civil servants and weakening the U.S. abroad. Like most things in life, the political reality is a little of both.
What Trump is doing is eerily similar to what Warren G. Harding did when he entered office more than 100 years ago. Like Trump, Harding was an America First candidate who supported protective tariffs, cutting spending and supply-side economics. The country was drowning in war debt and executive leadership was absent, as President Wilson had suffered a stroke in his last year in office. The public was largely in the dark about his competency.
Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?
America has long had a spending problem, which has resulted in debt and corruption. In retribution, President Trump signed an executive order to create the Department of Government Efficacy to reduce waste, cut regulations and improve efficiency. He tapped campaign supporter and billionaire Elon Musk to lead the way.
In doing so, Trump has centralized authority in an individual with significant conflicts of interest. In the backlash, there have been several attempts to check the power of Elon and DOGE.
Let’s say they overcome the challenges and succeed — what then? Regardless of party, most Americans feel the government spends too much and is unaccountable to the people. If Trump and Musk want to make lasting change to remedy the problem and avoid legal challenges, they should lobby Congress to create a new budget process instead of an executive band-aid fix.
Harding, like Trump, entered office after years of expanding government. Progressive-era reforms expanded the executive branch, creating the Food and Drug Administration, Federal Trade Commission and Federal Reserve System. Congress had no formal budgeting process at the time, leading to a “chaotic” financial system that produced waste, extravagance and inefficiency.
Once in office, Harding immediately called a special session of Congress. He tapped Andrew Mellon, one of the richest men in America, to head the Treasury. Mellon then lobbied Congress to pass the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921. The act created a new Bureau of the Budget (now the Office of Management and Budget) to review the federal budget, and centralized the budget preparation under the executive branch. To head the new bureau was Charles G. Dawes, who slashed around $350,000,000 from the budget in the first fiscal year.
Just as Harding recognized the need for reform during a period of financial chaos, today we face similar challenges, with an expanding executive branch and insufficient congressional oversight.
Of course, the budget process has evolved since the Harding administration. The first evolution established the framework and required the president to submit an annual budget to Congress, with the Bureau of the Budget facilitating it. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 gave Congress a more active role in budgeting, including creating a budget resolution to guide spending decisions.
However, the continuing growth of the executive branch and the stagnation of Congress have made proper oversight and review difficult. “More than 68 percent of America’s spending is on AUTOPAY with no Congressional review or renewal required,” according to the Senate Budget Committee. Trump and Congress should champion this issue and use current media attention to move the needle, and consider creating a congressional review committee to tackle spending.
In order to carry such a review out effectively, though, Congress must increase its capacity. Expanding the House of Representatives would improve oversight and accountability by involving a broader range of perspectives and creating smaller, specialized committees to focus on spending details. This would allow for more in-depth scrutiny of the budget, ensure taxpayer money is better allocated, and reduce the potential for waste. A larger House could also enhance transparency and improve the overall budgeting process, offering a stronger check on executive power and making government spending more democratic and efficient.
While DOGE aims to centralize authority, a new budget process that includes expanding the House would distribute responsibility and improve oversight, ensuring that any fiscal reforms have a strong democratic foundation. Trump could deliver lasting change, by returning power back to the people where it belongs.
Jeff Mayhugh is the founding editor of Politics and Parenting and vice president at No Cap Fund.
Topics
-
Sharing Bank Accounts Can Deepen a Couple’s Relationship
Fewer couples are combining their bank accounts. But that trend may not promote partners’ overall financial health, experts say.The New York Times - 2d -
Chiefs lose 2025 Super Bowl: Identifying potential moves Kansas City can make to retool before next season
The Chiefs have their work cut out for them this offseasonCBS Sports - 6h -
49ers owner wants Brock Purdy 'here for a long time,' says 'we'll do everything we can to make that work'
Purdy is eligible for a contract extension this offseasonCBS Sports - 22h -
Leland Vittert readies his show's move to prime time on NewsNation: We can delve 'more into the "why"'
He's making the move to prime time, but Leland Vittert says his approach as anchor of NewsNation's "On Balance" is staying the same: "We're still going to be the fairest show on television." "We ...The Hill - 23h -
76ers owners confident despite 20-32 record, say team can 'make playoff run' and 'beat everybody in the East'
Philadelphia is in 11th place in the East with 30 regular-season games leftCBS Sports - 1d -
Here’s how much money NFL stars Patrick Mahomes, Saquon Barkley and Jalen Hurts can make in Super Bowl bonuses
Every player who wins the Super Bowl will get a $171,000 bonus from the NFL. Some stars will also get bonuses from their team.MarketWatch - 2d -
2025 Super Bowl: Chiefs know Jalen Carter can 'take over a game' quickly; what makes Eagles DT so 'unorthodox'
A look into who Carter is, on and off the fieldCBS Sports - 2d -
Can anyone stop Elon Musk’s hostile takeover of the US government?
The billionaire’s aggressive efficiency drive has critics warning of a constitutional crisis. Allies say he’s just getting startedFinancial Times - 4d -
Why Does Elon Musk Think He Can Treat the U.S. Government Like Twitter?
My latest five-whys looks at Musk’s motivations.Inc. - 4d
More from The Hill
-
RFK Jr. is the health revolution America needs
President Trump's nominee, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is the right person to lead Health and Human Services to transform the health care system from disease-treatment to prevention.The Hill - 34m -
Eric Adams on DOJ dismissing charges: 'I know that I must continue to regain your trust.’
New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) vowed that he would work to regain his constituents’ trust after the Justice Department (DOJ) directed federal prosecutors to dismiss the corruption case against ...The Hill - 35m -
Could soda, beer prices rise amid aluminum tariffs?
One major company has already warned higher prices could be required in the face of the new tariffs.The Hill - 45m -
Teen sentenced to 48 months in prison in nationwide swatting spree
A California teenager was sentenced to 48 months in prison on Tuesday following a series of interstate threats to injure individuals across the country. Alan W. Filion, 18, of Lancaster, Calif., ...The Hill - 46m -
Judge adjusts ruling blocking Musk, DOGE from Treasury Department payment systems
A federal judge Tuesday clarified that a ruling preventing Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing the Treasury Department’s payment systems does not extend to ...The Hill - 47m
More in Politics
-
Marc Fogel, American teacher held in Russia for 3.5 years, is released
Marc Fogel, an American school teacher, held by Russia for 3 1/2 years, will be released and allowed to come home, the White House said on Tuesday.NBC News - 7m -
RFK Jr. is the health revolution America needs
President Trump's nominee, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is the right person to lead Health and Human Services to transform the health care system from disease-treatment to prevention.The Hill - 34m -
Eric Adams on DOJ dismissing charges: 'I know that I must continue to regain your trust.’
New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) vowed that he would work to regain his constituents’ trust after the Justice Department (DOJ) directed federal prosecutors to dismiss the corruption case against ...The Hill - 35m -
Could soda, beer prices rise amid aluminum tariffs?
One major company has already warned higher prices could be required in the face of the new tariffs.The Hill - 45m -
Teen sentenced to 48 months in prison in nationwide swatting spree
A California teenager was sentenced to 48 months in prison on Tuesday following a series of interstate threats to injure individuals across the country. Alan W. Filion, 18, of Lancaster, Calif., ...The Hill - 46m