Collins, Britt raise concerns about NIH move to slash billions in research costs

Two Republican senators, including a reliable ally of President Trump, have raised concerns about the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) decision to cut billions of dollars of “indirect” costs on university research grants.

On Monday, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) called the move a “poorly conceived directive” that potentially violates federal law.

“I oppose the poorly conceived directive imposing an arbitrary cap on the indirect costs that are part of NIH grants and negotiated between the grant recipient and NIH,” she said in a statement.

Collins noted she had heard from several Maine institutions that the cuts, which in some cases would apply retroactively to existing grants, “would be devastating, stopping vital biomedical research and leading to the loss of jobs.”

The controversy stems from the NIH decision announced late Friday to cap payments for indirect costs at 15 percent. Indirect funding can cover universities’ overhead and administrative costs, like electricity and utilities, janitorial services and rent.

Billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency and the Trump administration have made slashing federal budgets and eliminating entire agencies a priority. They argue research institutions should adapt to become leaner and more efficient because taxpayers don’t need to be spending money on overhead.

The NIH is the nation’s top funder of biomedical research, and the move was met with shock and anger by universities, scientists and Democratic lawmakers. Experts have said the rate of indirect cost grants is negotiated far in advance between institutions and granting agencies.

Attorneys general of 22 states challenged the move in federal court Monday, arguing it is illegal because Congress specifically prohibited the NIH from changing its grant formula without its approval.

Collins, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, noted the fiscal 2024 appropriations law “includes language that prohibits the use of funds to modify NIH indirect costs.”

The Maine Republican said she called Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over the weekend to express her “strong opposition to these arbitrary cuts."

She said Kennedy, the nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, “promised that as soon as he is confirmed, he will re-examine this initiative.”

Kennedy’s confirmation appears almost certain, after Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) last week voted to advance the nomination after receiving several vaccine-related commitments from Kennedy.

Collins hasn’t spoken publicly about whether she will vote to confirm the longtime anti-vaccine activist as the nation’s top health official, but her statement Monday didn’t say she would make reversing the indirect funding decision a condition of her vote.

Kennedy can afford to have three Republican senators vote against him and still be confirmed.

But Collins wasn’t the only Republican to voice a concern about the change in NIH research funding reimbursement.

Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.), a staunch ally of Trump, suggested the administration should proceed cautiously to mitigate the impact to research universities of substantial cuts.

Britt told AL.com she will work with the administration to protect innovation and research, following the NIH announcement about funding.

Britt acknowledged the rationale for the change, saying “hard-earned taxpayer money should be spent efficiently, judiciously, and accountably — without exception.”

But she gently expressed concerns about the impact on the universities in her state.

“While the administration works to achieve this goal at NIH, a smart, targeted approach is needed in order to not hinder life-saving, groundbreaking research at high-achieving institutions like those in Alabama,” Britt told the outlet.

Topics

22 states sue to block Trump cuts to NIH research payments

Attorneys general in 22 states sued the top health agencies Monday, attempting to block the Trump administration’s plan to slash grant funding to universities and research institutions across the ...
The Hill - 13h
New Zealand raises ‘concern’ as Cook Islands prepares to sign China deal

Deputy PM says New Zealand hasn’t been adequately consulted on an agreement the Cook Islands leader is expected to sign in Beijing this week. A diplomatic row has erupted between two tight-knit ...
The Guardian - 1d
NIH announces it's slashing funding for indirect research costs

The National Institutes of Health announced that the agency is making cuts to grants that support research institutions by limiting the amount of indirect funding for research projects to just 15%.
NBC News - 2d
NIH cuts overhead funding for research

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) on Friday made a significant reduction in grants reserved for research institutions, a decision that may significantly impact American higher education. The ...
The Hill - 2d
Trump administration to cut billions in medical research funding

National Institutes of Health said the $4bn loss will affect ‘indirect’ funding of buildings, equipment and staff. The Trump administration is cutting billions of dollars in medical research ...
The Guardian - 2d
Power Rankings: Jets move into No. 1 spot, plus what's super about each team

There's a new team on top this week as the Jets and Capitals keep swapping positions. Plus, what's super about each team.
ESPN - 2d
What to know about New York's poultry market shutdowns amid bird flu concerns

New York has announced a temporary shutdown of all live poultry markets as the state attempts to contain the bird flu outbreak. CBS News correspondent Lilia Luciano reports.
CBS News - 3d
Anduril in talks to raise money at $28 billion valuation as defense-tech booms

Anduril has signed a term sheet to raise up to $2.5 billion at a valuation of $28 billion, according to sources close to the company.
CNBC - 3d