Colleges are overlooking a simple solution to the Gaza protests: Free speech zones
At the core of every free speech demand is the insistence that others will listen.
Recent free speech actions on elite American university campuses are making it impossible not to listen, and escalating threats of violence have become a widespread and worrisome element. The subject of this speech concerns a list of demands, including a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza conflict and divestment from Israel, accompanied by shouted accusations of genocide or anti-Zionist and antisemitic taunts. Attempts to find a resolution have been rejected. The cycle of confrontation and reply in the past few days has been months in the making, and the pedagogy at elite universities has been implicated as a root cause.
It is understood that the First Amendment never instantiated an unfettered right to speech at all times and in all circumstances. Speech is prohibited under well-known categories that include defamation, fraud, obscenity, child pornography, threats and incitement.
Nevertheless, it is a hard needle to thread, as we allow, for example, the burning of a U.S. flag as a form of speech. In that case, the action is violent, but it is not associated with specific incitement. The right to burn a U.S. flag was upheld in Texas v. Johnson (1989); the court held that flag burning was a form of symbolic speech and that although an action might be very offensive to some, our outrage alone is not sufficient to ban speech.
Because private universities are not government entities, they are not strictly bound by the First Amendment. Nevertheless, the broad practice among most private universities is to support and encourage free speech. Truly private universities may be extremely rare, however, as most private universities receive federal money through tuition obtained by a federal loan program. Practically, private universities don’t need the cudgel of the federal government to support free speech, but they also need not seek a form of speech more permissive than the federal government would tolerate.
Free speech advocates all struggle with the problem of demanding a right to speak absent a duty to listen. According to the counter-speech doctrine, the best way to respond to negative speech is to counter with positive speech. This model assumes that agnostic listeners will naturally embrace positive speech and reject negative speech. But in the age of fake news, the truthfulness of any speech can be very difficult to parse. The explosion of social media, and the capacity to block the speech that one does not abide, results in perpetual conflict. No one learns. No one wins.
A legal concept known as the “captive audience doctrine” may be the most practical solution.
In the law, the captive audience doctrine seeks to relieve recipients from being held captive by unwanted speech. Free speech jurisprudence is incomplete when it fails to recognize, that in addition to a right to listen, a right against compelled listening is required. In constitutional law, the doctrine applies when an individual cannot, as a practical matter, escape intrusive speech. In labor law, the doctrine prohibits either party to a union election from making a speech on company time to a mass assembly of employees within 24 hours of an election.
How can a university both promote and permit speech while upholding the captive audience doctrine? As a model, consider Speakers Corner in Hyde Park in London.
The code for Speakers’ Corner permits speech, provided it is lawful, does not use offensive language, is respectful of alternative opinions, and shows courtesy to other speakers and members of the public. Hyde Park is 359 acres and Speakers’ Corner occupies, as the name suggests, a small corner. In this way, park visitors can enjoy many parts of the park unimpacted by Speakers’ Corner actions. A university could designate a part of the campus as such a “speakers’ corner.” Such a location should be reasonably accessible and accommodating of those who wish to listen while allowing those who do not wish to listen to be able to enjoy their university experience.
Speakers’ Corner can be a beacon of new ideas and provide for the exchange of ideas. Naturally, other rules can be put in place including limits on the time of day (not after dark), not during examination periods, no camping, no obstructing other speakers, and no speakers outside of the university members. Mostly, the idea would be to permit, as opposed to restrict, speech. Once offered, those university members demanding the opportunity to speak can prove the sincerity of such a demand. A refusal by a person or group to be bound by the very reasonable rules would reveal an insincere and potentially dangerous and obstructive intent. A university would be therefore within its legal right to block or remove such activity from the campus and community.
While the use of police to disperse a claimed speech right has not been universally effective in quieting an angry crowd, when danger to others supervenes, the university must restore safety — in some cases, it will be necessary to use force. The aftermath of arrest and removal will be critical. Permanent bans or even highly punitive bans are antithetical to the survival of embedded communities like a university. Instead, implement punishment followed by real opportunities for reconciliation and repatriation.
Universities need to rapidly convene interested parties to establish free speech zones, lawfully tempered by a captive audience doctrine. In this way, conversations about speech content can be set aside. The right to tempered speech is a cornerstone of our civil society, but in this untethered moment, the cacophony of words has become more gasoline for the fire.
Joel Zivot, MD, MA, JM, is associate professor of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Emory School of Medicine; former adjunct professor at the Emory School of Law; and senior fellow in the Emory Center for Ethics.
Date: |
Filter
-
EA Sports College Football 25 Preorders Are Live, Include Free Gift Card At Best Buy
Preorder EA Sports College Football 25 Standard Edition ...GameSpot - Tech - College Football -
Don’t be fooled by college protests, Gen Z wants dialogue on Israel and Palestine
We can’t let a vocal minority control the narrative that universities and its students aren’t equipped for political discussion, or that they don’t want it.The Hill - Politics - Israel -
Police clear protest encampment over war in Gaza at UC Irvine
Police have cleared a lecture hall at the University of California-Irvine after hundreds of protesters occupied the building for several hours Wednesday. Officers dismantled an encampment and barricades while detaining some of the protesters. CBS ...CBS News - Top stories -
Raskin presses insurers, PBMs on free contraception coverage
The top Democrat on the House Oversight and Accountability Committee wants to know how the country’s top health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers plan to make it easier for people to access contraception for free. In letters sent Thursday ...The Hill - Politics -
Are free dating apps worth your time?
Thinking of trying out online dating? Here's a breakdown on whether or not dating apps are worth your time.CBS News - Top stories -
With its critical mineral strategy, Australia seeks to break free from China
Yahoo News - World - Australia -
Why did Arsenal let Vivianne Miedema leave on a free at 27?
What makes the situation most striking is Arsenal’s apparent willingness to allow the Dutch star’s contract to run out. Moving the Goalposts: sign up for our free newsletter“Miedema … still Miedema … magnificent Miedema.” A line of commentary that ...The Guardian - World -
Shaken by the Fico assassination attempt, the EU wonders if June elections can be free of violence
In an increasingly vitriolic political climate, the last thing needed in the runup to the June European Union elections was an assassination attempt on one of the bloc’s most controversial figuresABC News - World -
Top 25 MLB free-agent rankings: Are Juan Soto, Alex Bregman and Pete Alonso helping or hurting their future paydays?
Free agency is more than 5 months away, but today's performances will shape this winter's contracts.Yahoo Sports - Sports -
Madden NFL 25 Preorders Are Live - Here's How To Get A Free $10 Gift Card
Preorder Madden NFL 25 Standard Edition ...GameSpot - Tech - NFL
More from The Hill
-
House panels vote to hold Garland in contempt
Two House committees on Thursday advanced measures to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress in an effort to censure him for failing to turn over audio recordings of the president. A last-minute move from President Biden to ...The Hill - Politics -
Chaos erupts in hearing as Greene, Ocasio-Cortez clash over ‘fake eyelashes’ jibe at Crockett
A House Oversight Committee hearing devolved into chaos Thursday night as Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) clashed after the firebrand Republican accused Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) of wearing “fake ...The Hill - Politics -
Swalwell slams GOP lawmakers for going to see Trump trial
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) went after his GOP colleagues who traveled to New York City to appear at former President Trump’s criminal trial this week. The California Democrat specifically took it to his colleagues who skipped a hearing Thursday ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump -
California bill that would have banned selling anti-aging skin products to young kids fails to advance
A bill in California that sought to ban the sale of anti-aging skin products to young kids failed to advance through the California State Assembly on Thursday. The bill, introduced by Assemblymember Alex Lee, prohibited kids under 13 from buying ...The Hill - Politics - California -
Fox anchor applauds Kansas City Chiefs kicker's controversial remarks
Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham applauded Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker on Thursday after he gave controversial speech including remarks on women in the workforce. Butker’s commencement speech at Benedictine College made clear his ...The Hill - Politics - NFL