After all the outlandish pardons we’ve seen, why won’t anyone help Don Siegelman?
It is tiresome, but not surprising, that the polarized commentary in the days since the blizzard of pardons and clemencies issued back-to-back by Presidents Biden and Trump has focused on which one's pardons were a worse affront to the rule of law.
It is fair to say that each president’s exercise of the pardon power pushed the outer limits of legitimacy. In fact, the types of pardons they issued — Joe Biden’s preemptive pardons and Trump’s pardon of the January 6 rioters — were raised at the constitutional convention of 1787 as reasons not to allow the president that power.
George Mason argued presciently that the president “ought not to have the power of pardoning, because he may frequently pardon crimes which were advised by himself. ... If he has the power of granting pardons before indictment, or conviction, may he not stop inquiry and prevent detection?” James Madison’s answer, which carried the day, was that any such abuses of the pardon power could be cured by impeachment.
Putting aside the academic question of whether Biden and Trump have committed impeachable offenses by virtue of their abuse of the pardon power, it is clear that the power was vested in the president not to fulfill such narrowly self-interested objectives but for cases in which the harsh administration of justice requires a safety-valve of mercy.
It is fair to ask what happened to such cases in the avalanche of inappropriate pardons. Was anyone left behind? Was anyone actually denied a pardon? If so, why?
After all, the pardons covered everyone from violent seditionists who assaulted police officers to purveyors of the “dark web,” from nonviolent drug dealers and Biden family members to death row inmates whose sentences for murder were commuted, from deceased civil rights pioneers to people who haven’t even been investigated yet. Surely anyone left off the list must be a monstrous criminal, unworthy of mercy in any form.
Not so.
Former Alabama Attorney General and Gov. Don Siegelman’s (D) request for a pardon from Joe Biden was answered with a one-line note: “…favorable action is not warranted ... application was denied by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., on January 20, 2025.”
What depraved criminal act justified the conclusion that a pardon was “not warranted” for Siegelman? He didn’t assault police officers on his way to vandalizing our nation’s Capitol. He didn’t operate a dark website that facilitated everything from money laundering to gun-running. He didn’t lie in order to purchase a firearm. He didn’t engage in a seditious conspiracy.
No. Siegelman reappointed a business executive to an unpaid state health board.
And unfortunately for him, he wasn’t a Biden relative.
According to the prosecution, Siegelman did this to reward the executive for his financial support. Unlike in the vast majority of corruption cases, however, that financial support did not go directly to the governor's campaign; in fact, the executive had supported Siegelman's opponent. Nor did the financial support benefit Siegelman personally, or any of his family members. Instead, the contribution was made to a political action committee formed to promote the use of state lottery proceeds to finance public education.
Nor was the appointment to the unpaid health board a new appointment. Prior governors, whose candidacies — unlike Siegelman’s — had been supported by the executive, had appointed him to the board without question, let alone indictment. For this offense, Siegelman was sentenced to and served seven years in federal prison.
I became aware of his plight when, as a former state attorney general, I was asked to support his legal appeals. Along with more than 100 other former attorneys general of both parties (I am an independent), I joined those efforts.
Siegelman’s case also garnered widespread media attention and bipartisan support for his cause.
As dean of the Rutgers School of Law—Newark at the time, I asked our Constitutional Litigation Clinic to study how Siegelman’s sentence compared with the sentences imposed in other corruption cases. The clinic’s conclusion was unequivocal: the Siegelman conviction and sentence were readily distinguishable from virtually every other contemporaneous corruption prosecution in their overreach and harshness.
In a December letter to Biden, in support of a pardon for Siegelman, I concluded: “It is too late now to address the flawed legal basis for the Siegelman prosecution, but not too late to address its ultimate impact, which was personal. It ruined a man’s career and, for many years, his life.”
Normally, when a requested pardon is summarily denied, as Siegelman’s was by President Biden on Jan. 20, there is no context in which to evaluate the fairness of the decision that mercy was “unwarranted.”
Not so this year. Biden's denial should be evaluated in light of the pardons he considered “warranted.” Biden’s denial of mercy to Siegelman, considered in light of the pardons he did grant from sheer nepotism and perhaps fear of legal harm to himself, lays bare his affront to the rule of law and the lasting stain on his presidency.
Trump’s blanket clemency for violent rioters who tried to disrupt the orderly transition of power — a literal assault on our democracy — broadens the context still further. To allow Siegelman’s conviction to remain unaddressed in light of those pardons would be to mock any notion of equal justice under law.
Cases like Siegelman’s expose just how lawless and abusive both presidents’ exercise of raw power has been, and how sagacious the founders’ concerns were over the pardon power's potential abuse. We have seen how ineffectual impeachment is as a remedy; perhaps these abuses will inspire a constitutional amendment addressing the preemptive pardons and pardons of criminal cronies that George Mason raised in 1788 — exercises of raw power that he feared would enable an ill-motivated president, “at some future day ... [to] establish a monarchy, and destroy the republic.”
For Siegelman, the disappointment is great, but hope springs eternal. Trump hasn’t yet considered the merits of his case. If he does, perhaps he will look at the Siegelman prosecution and his seven years in prison, look in the mirror, and say to himself, “There, but for the grace of November 6, 2024, go I. And I would pardon me.”
For Siegelman, it is far too late for justice, but it is never too late for a proper dose of mercy.
John J. Farmer Jr. served as an assistant U.S. Attorney, attorney general of New Jersey, senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission, and director of the Eagleton Institute of Politics, among other roles.
-
Obama's chumminess with Trump doesn't seem to have helped anyone
Michelle Obama's absence from Jimmy Carter's funeral was likely a decision to not engage with Donald Trump. But why did Barack have to get so chummy with him?The Hill - 3d -
‘We’ve lost all hope’: Rohingya trapped as Bangladesh closes Myanmar border
Muslim refugees fleeing persecution in Myanmar are being detained and forced back by Bangladeshi border guards. In the dim light of his home in Arakan, Myanmar, Mohammed is talking above the ...The Guardian - Jan. 22 -
Biden pardons Marcus Garvey, Don Scott and 3 others in final full day action
Virginia House Speaker Don Scott told CBS News through tears that he is "so very grateful."CBS News - Jan. 19 -
‘I hate this movie, and I haven’t even seen it’ – Americans won’t let a chimp Robbie Williams entertain them
Better Man is a genuinely good movie but it’s bombing – and now his song has been disqualified from the Oscars too. Despite the terrible box office performance, and movie theatres cancelling ...The Guardian - Jan. 16 -
Trump says he won’t hire anyone associated with Haley, Cheneys, other GOP critics
President-elect Trump on Wednesday said he would not consider individuals affiliated with a host of Republican rivals and critics for jobs in his incoming administration, singling out former Vice ...The Hill - Jan. 16 -
This Communication Hack Can Help You Persuade Anyone
Science reveals how the present tense can be your superpower.Inc. - Jan. 12 -
11 More of the Most Fun Things We’ve Seen at CES
As our week in Las Vegas winds to a close, here’s a final look at the most clever, smart, and forward-looking tech at CES 2025.Wired - Jan. 8 -
10 More of the Coolest Things We’ve Seen at CES 2025
More of the wild ideas and clever innovations we’re seeing this week at tech’s big show in Las Vegas.Wired - Jan. 7 -
The 10 Coolest Things We’ve Seen So Far at CES 2025
Tech's big show isn’t fully underway yet, but the odd and wonderful gadgets are already here. These are the coolest things we saw at the event preview.Wired - Jan. 6
More from The Hill
-
Multiple groups call on Senate to reject Vought nomination
Multiple groups called on the Senate to reject President Trump’s pick for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) director, Russell Vought. In three separate letters, the Coalition for Sensible ...The Hill - 35m -
What we know about Army helicopter, regional plane crash
Welcome to The Hill's Defense & NatSec newsletter {beacon} Defense &National Security Defense &National Security The Big Story Investigations underway into military helicopter, plane crash A ...The Hill - 45m -
Kash Patel grilled on potential Trump pressure, past comments at contentious hearing
Kash Patel, President Trump’s nominee to lead the FBI, was at the center of a contentious confirmation hearing Thursday, facing intense grilling from Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee ...The Hill - 46m -
Nissan slimming down US production, offering buyouts
Japanese automaker Nissan is slimming down its production in the U.S. and offering buyouts to workers in a push to cut jobs after reporting losses during the last quarter. Nissan is offering ...The Hill - 1h -
Gloria Estefan to Congress: Support for women's homeless shelters 'a no-brainer'
She's used to belting out her hits, but now Gloria Estefan is using her voice in a different way on Capitol Hill, urging lawmakers to support legislation focused on homelessness and funding for ...The Hill - 1h
More in Politics
-
Multiple groups call on Senate to reject Vought nomination
Multiple groups called on the Senate to reject President Trump’s pick for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) director, Russell Vought. In three separate letters, the Coalition for Sensible ...The Hill - 35m -
What we know about Army helicopter, regional plane crash
Welcome to The Hill's Defense & NatSec newsletter {beacon} Defense &National Security Defense &National Security The Big Story Investigations underway into military helicopter, plane crash A ...The Hill - 45m -
Kash Patel grilled on potential Trump pressure, past comments at contentious hearing
Kash Patel, President Trump’s nominee to lead the FBI, was at the center of a contentious confirmation hearing Thursday, facing intense grilling from Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee ...The Hill - 46m -
Trump’s speculation on plane crash is ‘reckless,’ says Kansas lawmaker
Rep. Sharice Davids (D-Kan.) joins Meet the Press NOW to discuss her state's reaction to the collision of a military helicopter and a passenger jet that took off from Wichita, Kansas, and President ...NBC News - 1h -
Homeland Security Committee Chairman: 'NTSB will get to the bottom' of Potomac collision
Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, joins Meet the Press NOW to discuss the federal investigations into the collision between a passenger jet and military ...NBC News - 1h