A stunning reversal on academic boycotts is all about Israel
There was a time when the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) deserved its self-description as the “most prominent guardian of academic freedom” for faculty and students in the U.S., but not any longer.
Last month, the organization rescinded its long-standing opposition to academic boycotts, which it had previously recognized as aiming “directly at the free exchange of ideas,” in favor of a new policy declaring that such boycotts “can legitimately seek to protect and advance . . . academic freedom and fundamental rights.”
The turnaround is a betrayal of academic values, which ideally comprise the “freedom of teachers and researchers to engage in work with academic colleagues” and “the freest possible international movement of scholars and ideas,” without political restraints.
The very purpose of an academic boycott, however, is to impose limitations on scholarly exchanges by placing certain institutions or faculty off limits.
Although the revised AAUP statement does not mention Israel or Palestine, it is obvious that it came about in the context of the siege of Gaza and the intensified efforts of the boycott, divest, sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.
The AAUP leadership has admitted as much, saying that "Academic boycotts, it seems, cannot be thought about apart from the polarizing geopolitics of Palestine and Israel."
But the facilitation of a political campaign, whatever its merits, cannot justify retreating from academic principles.
Defenders of the AAUP’s position claim that a boycott can actually “protect and advance” academic freedom by targeting only those nations or institutions “that themselves violate academic freedom or the fundamental rights upon which academic freedom depends.”
The consequence of a truly effective boycott, however, would inexorably limit academic freedom in those circumstances, rather than enhance it, by choking off what might be the faculty’s most meaningful contact with the outside scholarly world.
In the words of a former chair of the AAUP Committee on Academic Freedom, “The whole idea of boycotting academic institutions in order to defend academic freedom is utterly wrongheaded.”
Equally wrongheaded is the argument that boycotts can be aimed exclusively at institutions rather than “individual scholars and teachers.” This is incoherent even in theory, given that the lives and careers of students and teachers are necessarily intertwined with their universities.
The boycott of an institution — including, say, the refusal to participate in conferences, review tenure files or transfer credits — will inevitably take a toll on students and faculty.
The distinction has already proven impossible in practice.
A University of Michigan professor, for example, refused to write a reference for a student’s participation in a university-sponsored program in Israel. He explained that his adherence to the “academic boycott against Israel” precludes “writing letters of recommendation for students planning to study there,” although he would gladly provide a reference for any other country.
The editors of a scholarly journal at the University of Minnesota refused to consider a submission from an Israeli Ph.D. “due to the journal's commitment to BDS guidelines” and the author’s “affiliation with Israeli academic institutions.”
In fact, the author’s affiliation was with a German University, which led to a cryptic apology from the journal, though the harm had already been done. In an email exchange, the editors declined to tell me how or whether they would apply BDS guidelines in the future.
Even worse is likely to come. In Europe, Israeli authors’ articles are summarily “rejected by journals” and “reviewers refuse to review Israeli research projects or academic papers.” Some universities have imposed “bans on inviting Israelis to academic conferences.”
Then there is the platitude that “individual faculty members and students should be free to weigh, assess and debate the specific circumstances giving rise to calls for systematic academic boycotts.” Thus, as the AAUP president put it, there is a “collective and individual [right] of faculty members to decide democratically to support a systematic academic boycott.”
The AAUP’s original opposition, however, addressed only the wisdom and intellectual validity of boycotting, not the right of individuals to engage in it.
Faculty members, like all citizens, have many rights of speech and association that can be harmful when exercised. They can belong to discriminatory private clubs, oppose equitable admissions policies, advocate censorship, or perhaps deny the Holocaust (if kept out of their teaching).
But the AAUP would never declare such activity “legitimate,” even though protected by the First Amendment.
As the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression put it, there is no contradiction between recognizing “the rights of individual students and faculty” and opposing “academic boycotts as a threat to academic freedom.”
The tragic irony of the new AAUP position is that it will surely be used to promote the boycott of Israeli universities, which happen to be the most liberal, peace-oriented, and integrated institutions in the country.
Jewish and Arab students at Tel Aviv University, for example, have annually observed Nakba Day, commemorating the dispossession and exile of Palestinians that occurred during Israel’s war of independence.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his settler allies are no friends of higher education, which they accurately see as a locus of resistance to their oppressive government. Nor would they care if Israeli scholars are isolated from their international colleagues.
By weakening Israeli universities, the academic boycotters are undermining the cease-fire movement and strengthening the eliminationists.
As the Polish psychology professor Michał Bilewicz wrote in the Chronicle of Higher Education, “Academic boycotts hurt dissidents most.”
And now, they have the blessing of the AAUP.
Steven Lubet is the Williams Memorial Professor Emeritus at the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.
Date: | |
Tag: | Israel |
-
The Wall Street Journal - Business
Your Company Is Watching You. And Probably Doing It All Wrong.
Employers often feel like they have to keep an eye on their workers, especially those working remotely. There are bad ways to do it and not-as-bad ways.Yesterday -
Yahoo News - World
Four Palestinians killed in Gaza, Israel hits another former school
59 minutes ago - Israel -
Yahoo Sports - Sports
Raiders stun Ravens with late field goal to grab upset win in another huge survivor pool elimination
Nearly 30% of users in Yahoo Sports survivor pools picked the Ravens to beat the Raiders on Sunday afternoon.37 minutes ago - NFL -
Yahoo News - World
Houthi rebels say they struck Israel with a 'new hypersonic ballistic missile' that flew more than 1,200 miles in just over 11 minutes
3 hours ago - Israel -
NBC News - Top stories
Trump plans to visit Springfield, Ohio, the site of his baseless claims about Haitian immigrants
Former President Donald Trump is planning to visit Springfield, Ohio, "soon," a source familiar with the planning told NBC News.2 hours ago - Donald Trump -
The Wall Street Journal - World
Trump Posts Disdain for Taylor Swift, Vance Defends Pet-Eating Claims
The GOP running mates defend unfounded pet-eating rumors and criticize the pop star who endorsed Harris.2 hours ago - Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
More than a dozen Reagan alumni endorse Vice President Harris
Seventeen Republicans who worked under former President Reagan endorsed Vice President Harris, her campaign announced in a press release Sunday. In the endorsement, which cited Reagan’s “Time for ...25 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Harris expresses relief Trump safe after gunshots
Vice President Harris on Sunday said she was briefed on the reports of gunshots near former President Trump in Florida and expressed relief he was reported safe in the incident. "I have been ...26 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Harris campaign comms director: Americans 'deserve a second debate’
Harris-Walz Communications Director Michael Tyler said Sunday that the American people “deserve a second debate” and signaled he was “confident” there would be another one. In an interview on Fox ...37 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Dwindling Western influence amid uncertainty in the Sahel region
Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have formed the Confederation of Sahel States (AES) to reject Western pressures and establish a defense pact, signaling a shift in West Africa's geopolitical landscape ...1 hour ago -
The Hill - Politics
Harris pulls closer to Trump in Iowa: Poll
Vice President Harris narrowed former President Trump’s lead in Iowa to just 4 points, down from the Republican’s 18-point lead over President Biden in June, according to a poll released Sunday. ...1 hour ago - Donald Trump