Ex-White House ethics lawyer: Judge will find Trump quote posts in violation of gag order
Former White House ethics lawyer Jim Schultz said that he thinks the New York judge in former President Trump’s hush money case will still find his social media posts quoting others as violating the gag order in the case.
“He's referencing the jurors, he's, he's pushing out something that someone else said, yes,” Schultz, who served under the Trump administration, said on “CNN News Central” to anchor Sara Sidner Thursday. “But the bottom line is, it applies to him, right?”
“So, I think the judge is gonna see this as a violation of the gag order and get ready, they're gonna continue and continue and continue," he continued. "Sure, the judge can fine him, he could admonish him. He could do a lot of things in the courtroom. He's not gonna throw him in jail."
This trial’s still gonna continue," Schultz added. "And you're still gonna hear from Donald Trump on Truth Social.”
The former attorney's remarks come after Trump took an indirect swing at prospective jurors in the case Wednesday, quoting Fox News host Jesse Watters. The former president, under the expanded gag order, is prohibited from “making or directing others to make public statements about any prospective juror or any juror in this criminal proceeding.”
In his post, Trump quoted Watters saying: "They are catching undercover Liberal Activists lying to the Judge in order to get on the Trump Jury."
Schultz wasn't the first legal expert to question whether the move would be considered a violation of the order. Legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin made the same inference earlier this week.
“I think it’s false, but more importantly, it’s clearly, I think, an attempt to intimidate jurors,” Toobin said, “And it is clearly barred by the gag order in this case.”
“Donald Trump doesn’t seem to realize he is now a criminal defendant, and criminal defendants have different and lesser rights than ordinary citizens,” Toobin continued. “They are not allowed to interfere in the trial process — especially when there is a gag order that specifically addresses attempts to intimidate jurors. I mean, it is just not permissible.”
The trial, which began Monday, is the first criminal trial of a sitting or former president in U.S. history. Jury selection, which spanned over several days, was completed Friday and the trial will continue next week.
The case is centered on allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal a hush money payment made to an adult film star to hide an alleged affair ahead of the 2016 election. He has pleaded not guilty.
Date: | |
Tag: | Donald Trump |
Filter
-
Does an Upside-Down American Flag at Alito’s House Violate Judicial Ethics?
Judicial experts say an upside-down flag at the justice’s home raises thorny questions about potential ethics violations and what circumstances require recusal from cases.The New York Times - Top stories -
Ethics Panel Cautions Juan Merchan, Judge in Trump Trial, Over Political Donations
Justice Juan M. Merchan, the judge overseeing Donald J. Trump’s criminal trial in Manhattan, donated modest amounts to Democratic groups in 2020.The New York Times - Top stories - Donald Trump -
Trump asks NY high court to intervene in gag order fight
Former President Trump asked New York’s highest court to intervene in his fight to throw out the gag order in his ongoing hush money criminal trial, one day after a mid-level appellate court upheld it. Trump’s attorney filed a notice of appeal on ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
Democrats request probe of ballot signatures for Michigan GOP candidates
Democrats in Michigan are requesting state election official investigate whether GOP Senate candidates and another forged or wrote fraudulent signatures on petitions. The letter, obtained by The Detroit Free Press, is signed by the Michigan ...The Hill - Politics -
People who had an iPhone 7 may qualify for piece of $35 million Apple settlement
If you were once an owner of the iPhone 7, or its larger sibling the iPhone 7 Plus, you could qualify for a piece of the $35 million settlement Apple has agreed to pay out.The Hill - Politics - Apple -
Is COVID-19 still a 'pandemic?'
On March 11, 2020, the director-general of the World Health Organization told the world that COVID-19 "can be characterized as a pandemic." Is that still the case?The Hill - Politics - Covid -
Three years after the US exit, Afghanistan still needs our help
The U.S. took its eye off the Afghan ball before, with tragic consequences.The Hill - Politics -
Member of Taiwan’s parliament steals bill to prevent its passage
Members of the Taiwanese legislature clashed in a chaotic brawl this week, resulting in members being tackled and hit, after a member attempted to steal a bill to prevent it from being passed. Lawmakers were seen leaping over tables and pulling ...The Hill - Politics