Court rejects parents' attempt to opt kids out of LGBTQ-inclusive reading assignments
A federal appeals court rejected a bid from a group of Maryland parents to require Montgomery County Public Schools to allow them to opt their children out of lessons that involve LGBTQ-inclusive material.
A divided three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision denying a preliminary injunction on the basis that the parents had not yet demonstrated how the country’s board of education book policy would infringe on their right to free expression of religion.
Three sets of parents – who are Muslim, Jewish and Christian – along with a parental rights organization, sued the Maryland school district after it said it would no longer allow parents to opt their children out of lessons that used a slate of newly approved LGBTQ-inclusive books.
The parents argued that the books “contradict their sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage, human sexuality, and gender” and that the lack of an opt-out policy violates their children’s First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.
U.S. Circuit Judge G. Steven Agee, writing for the majority in the opinion, said there was not enough evidence on the record to assess how the books were being used in the classroom and, therefore, to assess the likelihood of the case succeeding.
“We take no view on whether the Parents will be able to present evidence sufficient to support any of their various theories once they have the opportunity to develop a record as to the circumstances surrounding the Board’s decision and how the challenged texts are actually being used in schools,” Agee, appointed by former President George W. Bush, wrote.
“At this early stage, however, given the Parents’ broad claims, the very high burden required to obtain a preliminary injunction, and the scant record before us, we are constrained to affirm the district court’s order denying a preliminary injunction,” he continued, in the opinion, which was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge DeAndrea Benjamin, an appointee of President Biden’s.
U.S. Circuit Judge A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr., an appointee of former President Trump’s, dissented, arguing the board violated parents’ right to influence their children’s religious upbringing.
Eric Baxter – vice president and senior counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing the parents – pledged to appeal the ruling on Wednesday, in an emailed statement to The Hill.
“The court just told thousands of Maryland parents they have no say in what their children are taught in public schools,” Baxter said in his statement. “That runs contrary to the First Amendment, Maryland law, the School Board’s own policies, and basic human decency.”
“Parents should have the right to receive notice and opt their children out of classroom material that violates their faith. We will appeal this ruling,” he added.
In August 2023, U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman found that the parents were unlikely to succeed on the merits and denied their request to keep the policy in place while the case proceeds. She found that they failed to show that the lack of an opt-out policy would result in the “indoctrination of their children” or “coerce their children to violate or change their religious beliefs.”
“The parents still may instruct their children on their religious beliefs regarding sexuality, marriage, and gender, and each family may place contrary views in its religious context,” Boardman wrote in the order last year.
“No government action prevents the parents from freely discussing the topics raised in the storybooks with their children or teaching their children as they wish,” she added.
Date: |
Filter
-
After parade of support, one Trump family member was at verdict
Mr Trump second son was the only relation in the courtroom. His wife and eldest daughter have largely remained silent.BBC News - Top stories - Donald Trump -
Texas Supreme Court rejects abortion ban challenge
The court rejected a challenge brought by women who say they were denied medically necessary abortions.BBC News - Top stories - Abortion -
Why are 61% of parents still giving financial help to their adult kids? It’s the economy, stupid.
“Early-career recessions can have permanent effects,” one economist told MarketWatch.MarketWatch - Business -
Texas Supreme Court rejects challenge to abortion ban over medical exceptions
The Texas Supreme Court unanimously rejected a challenge to the state’s near-total abortion ban, ruling Friday that the law’s medical exceptions do not need to be clarified. Texas bans abortions in almost all circumstances, but the nine ...The Hill - Politics - Abortion -
Texas Supreme Court rejects challenge to abortion ban over medical exceptions
The Texas Supreme Court has rejected a challenge to the state's abortion ban — a response to a lawsuit filed last year by a group of women who suffered serious pregnancy complications.NBC News - Top stories - Abortion -
Texas Supreme Court Rejects Challenge on Exceptions to Abortion Ban
The court on Friday unanimously reversed a ruling that had expanded the definition of what counts as a medical emergency under the state’s strict abortion ban.The New York Times - Top stories - Abortion -
Texas Supreme Court rejects challenge to abortion ban from women who say their health was put at risk during pregnancies
Texas Supreme Court rejects challenge to abortion ban from women who say their health was put at risk during pregnanciesABC News - Health - Abortion -
Texas Supreme Court rejects challenge to state's abortion law over medical exceptions
The Texas Supreme Court has rejected a challenge to one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the U.S. following a lawsuit by women who had serious pregnancy complicationsABC News - Health - Abortion -
The Texas Supreme Court rejected a challenge from women who argued that medical exceptions to the state's abortion bans were inadequate.
The Texas Supreme Court rejected a challenge from women who argued that medical exceptions to the state’s abortion bans were inadequate.The Wall Street Journal - World - Abortion -
The Supreme Court revived a National Rifle Association lawsuit alleging a New York regulator unlawfully attempted to blacklist the organization because of its pro-gun views.
The Supreme Court revived a National Rifle Association lawsuit alleging a New York regulator unlawfully attempted to blacklist the organization because of its pro-gun views.The Wall Street Journal - World
More from The Hill
-
North America at a crossroads as Mexico kicks off trio of major elections
Looming elections across North America could upend a decades-long integration process as the continent’s three major nations face sharp choices between populism and traditional liberalism. The interactions among Mexican, U.S. and Canadian leaders ...The Hill - Politics -
In defending Trump, the GOP attacks the justice system
Republican allies of former President Trump are taking to the airwaves to boost his attacks on the justice system and condemn those who say people should respect the justice system that delivered his guilty verdict in the New York hush money ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump -
Trump’s hush money conviction: What happens next
NEW YORK — Former President Trump’s hush money trial ended in a sweeping conviction, but his historic case is far from over. As Trump vows to appeal, the proceedings will meanwhile move ahead toward sentencing on July 11 — just days before Trump ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump -
Women in Congress spotlight challenge of legislating as a new mother
A bipartisan effort to let new mothers vote by proxy after giving birth is putting a spotlight on the unique challenges congresswomen face as they weigh motherhood against the archaic rules of the House chamber. After suffering significant ...The Hill - Politics -
Stormy Daniels' lawyer says Trump's conviction in hush money case 'hit her hard'
A lawyer for Stormy Daniels, the adult film star central to former President Trump’s hush money trial, said Friday that Trump's recent conviction "hit her hard." “I got a pretty instant report from the courthouse,” Attorney Clark Brewster said in ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump